Maximilian ohle (25 resultados)

Paperback. Condición: New.

Paperback or Softback. Condición: New. Fortius Quo Fidelius?: Hierarchy and Bargaining in Russia's Relations with Transnistria and Abkhazia Since 1991. Book.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 250 pages. 5.83x0.65x8.27 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: Sehr gut. Zustand: Sehr gut | Seiten: 306 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized "republics" of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called "Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic" (PMR) and "Republic of Abkhazia" were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space.…

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. In English.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 216 pages. 9.18x6.12x9.45 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized "republics" of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called "Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic" (PMR) and "Republic of Abkhazia" were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space. This book examines how the unrecognized republics of Transnistria and Abkhazia, despite their loyalty to Russia, have occasionally challenged Moscow's authority. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. …

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized 'republics' of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called 'Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic' (PMR) and 'Republic of Abkhazia' were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space. 306 pp. Englisch.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized 'republics' of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called 'Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic' (PMR) and 'Republic of Abkhazia' were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space.…

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized "republics" of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called "Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic" (PMR) and "Republic of Abkhazia" were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space. This book examines how the unrecognized republics of Transnistria and Abkhazia, despite their loyalty to Russia, have occasionally challenged Moscow's authority. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. …

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized 'republics' of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called 'Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic' (PMR) and 'Republic of Abkhazia' were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space.Ibidem-Verlag, Leuschnerstrasse 40, 30457 Hannover 306 pp. Englisch.…

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Richard J. Cook, PhD, is an Associate Professor at the Department of International Relations, Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, China. His research interests include China-US Relations, International Relations of the As.…

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This book investigates how and to what extent the de facto regimes of the unrecognized "republics" of Transnistria in Moldova and Abkhazia in Georgia, albeit bound to Russia through loyalty and obsequiousness, can challenge the Kremlin's political authority. Although such situations have been rare, they occurred when the so-called "Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic" (PMR) and "Republic of Abkhazia" were dissatisfied with existing security, economic and cultural arrangements with Russia and subsequently mobilized sufficient bargaining power to correct them. Transnistria's resistance to Moscow's influence has been mostly linked to its economic interests. For instance, Tiraspol has avoided entanglement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as supporting it would have threatened its trade with the EU which has surpassed Russia as PMR's largest trading partner. Abkhazia has mostly projected its bargaining power when the Kremlin expected it to make concessions beyond its preferred range and threatened its distinct culture. Examples were the planned transfer of a state dacha in Pitsunda and a controversial 2024 investment agreement, granting property rights and tax benefits to Russian investors. Maximilian Ohle's analysis demonstrates that the relations between de facto regimes and their patron state are more nuanced, active, and dynamic than a simple top-down approach reveals. Transnistria and Abkhazia play a greater role than usually assumed within the wider geostrategic rivalry between the West and Russia in the post-Soviet space. This book examines how the unrecognized republics of Transnistria and Abkhazia, despite their loyalty to Russia, have occasionally challenged Moscow's authority. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. …

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Fortius Quo Fidelius? | Maximilian Ohle | Taschenbuch | 306 S. | Englisch | 2026 | ibidem-Verlag | EAN 9783838220895 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: ibidem-Verlag, Leuschnerstr. 40, 30457 Hannover, info[at]ibidem-verlag[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.