9781107181694 - Structured to Fail?: Regulatory Performance under Competing Mandates de Carrigan, Christopher (16 resultados)

Condición: good. Fast Free Shipping â" Good condition. It may show normal signs of use, such as light writing, highlighting, or library markings, but all pages are intact and the book is fully readable. A solid, complete copy that's ready to enjoy.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. In.

Condición: New. This book employs a diverse set of research methods to confront widely accepted principles of regulatory agency design. Num Pages: 280 pages. BIC Classification: JPP; KC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. hardcover. . . . .

Condición: New.

Condición: New. This book employs a diverse set of research methods to confront widely accepted principles of regulatory agency design. Num Pages: 280 pages. BIC Classification: JPP; KC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 320 pages. 9.25x6.50x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases.

Hardcover. Condición: New. NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to develop important conclusions for policy. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 320 pages. 9.25x6.50x0.75 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Hardback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to develop important conclusions for policy. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Gebunden. Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to .

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.