Randy kozel (34 resultados)

paperback. Condición: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority.

paperback. Condición: Near Fine. DETAILS: PAPERBACK, attractive copy, near fine. KOZEL, RANDY J. Settled versus right: a theory of precedent. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2017, x, 180pp., . "develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. [The author] contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go." - CONTENTS: Framing the study of precedent -- The stakes of deference -- Strength of constraint -- Scope of applicability -- Precedent and pluralism -- Precedential strength in doctrinal perspective -- Precedential strength in structural perspective -- Compromise, common ground, and precedential scope -- Implications and transitions. ISBN 9781107566521.…

paperback. Condición: Good. Good - Bumped and creased book with tears to the extremities, but not affecting the text block, may have remainder mark or previous owner's name - GOOD PAPERBACK Standard-sized.

Condición: New.

Paperback or Softback. Condición: New. Settled Versus Right: A Theory of Precedent. Book.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New. In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law.…

Paperback. Condición: new. New Copy. Customer Service Guaranteed.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 192 pages. 8.75x6.00x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. This book analyzes the theoretical nuances and practical implications of how judges use precedent. Num Pages: 192 pages. BIC Classification: 1KBB; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law.…

Condición: New. This book analyzes the theoretical nuances and practical implications of how judges use precedent. Num Pages: 192 pages. BIC Classification: 1KBB; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. Paperback. . . . .

Paperback. Condición: New. In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law.…

Condición: New.

Condición: New. This book analyzes the theoretical nuances and practical implications of how judges use precedent. Num Pages: 192 pages. BIC Classification: 1KBB; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. Hardback. . . . .

Condición: New.

Hardcover. Condición: New. NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Condición: New. This book analyzes the theoretical nuances and practical implications of how judges use precedent. Num Pages: 192 pages. BIC Classification: 1KBB; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 192 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law.…

Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. 188.

Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. 188.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 188.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law. This book provides an in-depth analysis of the role of precedent in American judicial practice, while also developing a new theory for using precedent as a bridge between judges who are otherwise inclined to disagree. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This book provides an in-depth analysis of the role of precedent in American judicial practice, while also developing a new theory for using precedent as a bridge between judges who are otherwise inclined to disagree.&Uumlber den Autor.…

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law. This book provides an in-depth analysis of the role of precedent in American judicial practice, while also developing a new theory for using precedent as a bridge between judges who are otherwise inclined to disagree. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…