potts nick (14 resultados)

Condición: Very Good. This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping. .

Condición: Very Good. Shipped within 24 hours from our UK warehouse. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. Spine still tight, in very good condition. Remember if you are not happy, you are covered by our 100% money back guarantee.

Hardcover. Condición: Very good. Estado de la sobrecubierta: very good. 283, [5] p. Illustrations. Cast of Characters. Chronology of Events. Index. From WIkipedia: "The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg with head offices in Karachi and London. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak. It operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$20 billion, making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. BCCI came under the scrutiny of numerous financial regulators and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to concerns that it was poorly regulated. Subsequent investigations revealed that it was involved in massive money laundering and other financial crimes, and illegally gained controlling interest in a major American bank. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and on 5 July of that year customs and bank regulators in seven countries raided and locked down records of its branch offices. Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection." The liquidators, Deloitte & Touche, filed a lawsuit against Price Waterhouse and Ernst & Young the bank's auditors which was settled for $175 million in 1998. A further lawsuit against UAE President Zayed II, a major shareholder, was launched in 1999 for approximately $400 million. BCCI creditors also instituted a $1 billion suit against the Bank of England as a regulatory body. After a nine-year struggle, due to the Bank's statutory immunity, the case went to trial in January 2004. However, in November 2005, Deloitte persuaded creditor Abu Dhabi to drop its claims against the Bank of England, except for a claim for return of its deposits, in that Abu Dhabi owned 77% of the bank shares at closing, and was therefore also facing a major lawsuit. To date liquidators have recovered about 75% of the creditors' lost money. A decade after its liquidation, its activities were still not completely understood.From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Bank of Credit and Commerce International Industry Banking Fate Liquidation / Forced closure Defunct 1991 Headquarters London (incorporated in Luxembourg) Key people Agha Hasan Abedi (Founder) Employees approx. 30, 000 The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. [1] The Bank was registered in Luxembourg with head offices in Karachi and London. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak. It operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$20 billion, making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. [2][3] BCCI came under the scrutiny of numerous financial regulators and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to concerns that it was poorly regulated. Subsequent investigations revealed that it was involved in massive money laundering and other financial crimes, and illegally gained controlling interest in a major American bank. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and on 5 July of that year customs and bank regulators in seven countries raided and locked down records of its branch offices. [4] Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection." The liquidators, Deloitte.

Hardcover. Condición: Very Good. Hardcover. No DJ. Pages are clean and unmarked except for highlighting up to page 8. Covers like new. Binding tight, hinges strong.; 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed! Ships same or next business day!

hardcover. Condición: Very Good. Clean sturdy and unmarked with mild shelf wear EP.

Condición: New. In.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 1st edition. 180 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This collection focuses on a long-running debate over the logical validity of Karl Marxs theory that exploitation is the exclusive source of capitalists profits. The Fundamental Marxian Theorem was long thought to have shown that orthodox Marxian economics succeeds in replicating Marxs conclusion. The debate begins with Andrew Klimans disproof of that claim. On one side of the debate, representing orthodox Marxian economics, are contributions by Simon Mohun and Roberto Veneziani. Although they concede that their simultaneist models cannot replicate Marxs theory of profit in all cases, they insist that this is as good as it gets. On the other side, representing the temporal single-system interpretation of Marxs theory (TSSI), are contributions by Kliman and Alan Freeman. They argue that his theory is logically valid, since it can indeed be replicated when it is understood in accordance with the TSSI. While the debate initially focused on logical concerns, issues of pluralism, truth, and scientificity increasingly assumed center stage. In his introduction to the volume, Nick Potts situates the debate in its historical context and argues forcefully that the arguments of the orthodox Marxist economists, and the manner in which those arguments were couched, were suppressive and contrary to scientific norms.The volume concludes with a 2014 debate, in which many of the same issues re-surfaced, between the philosopher Robert Paul Wolff and proponents of the TSSI. This volume brings together all the major contributions to the recent decade-long controversy over Karl Marxs theory that exploitation of workers is the exclusive source of capitalists profits. The debate explores different modern interpretations success in confirming Marxs conclusion. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This collection focuses on a long-running debate over the logical validity of Karl Marxs theory that exploitation is the exclusive source of capitalists profits. The Fundamental Marxian Theorem was long thought to have shown that orthodox Marxian economics succeeds in replicating Marxs conclusion. The debate begins with Andrew Klimans disproof of that claim. On one side of the debate, representing orthodox Marxian economics, are contributions by Simon Mohun and Roberto Veneziani. Although they concede that their simultaneist models cannot replicate Marxs theory of profit in all cases, they insist that this is as good as it gets. On the other side, representing the temporal single-system interpretation of Marxs theory (TSSI), are contributions by Kliman and Alan Freeman. They argue that his theory is logically valid, since it can indeed be replicated when it is understood in accordance with the TSSI. While the debate initially focused on logical concerns, issues of pluralism, truth, and scientificity increasingly assumed center stage. In his introduction to the volume, Nick Potts situates the debate in its historical context and argues forcefully that the arguments of the orthodox Marxist economists, and the manner in which those arguments were couched, were suppressive and contrary to scientific norms.The volume concludes with a 2014 debate, in which many of the same issues re-surfaced, between the philosopher Robert Paul Wolff and proponents of the TSSI. This volume brings together all the major contributions to the recent decade-long controversy over Karl Marxs theory that exploitation of workers is the exclusive source of capitalists profits. The debate explores different modern interpretations success in confirming Marxs conclusion. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This volume brings together all the major contributions to the recent decade-long controversy over Karl Marx s theory that exploitation of workers is the exclusive source of capitalists profits. The debate explores different modern interpretations success.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This volume brings together all the major contributions to the recent decade-long controversy over Karl Marx's theory that exploitation of workers is the exclusive source of capitalists' profits. The debate explores different modern interpretations' success in confirming Marx's conclusion.