Harder sirko (33 resultados)

Condición: very good. Gently used. May include previous owner's signature or bookplate on the front endpaper, sticker on back and/or remainder mark on text block.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 466 pages. 9.50x6.75x1.25 inches. In Stock.

paperback. Condición: Very Good.

Condición: very good. Oxford & Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010. Hardcover. xxxviii, 323 pp. - This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages. Damages are defined as the monetary award made by a court in consequence of a breach of contract, a tort or an equitable wrong. In all these causes of action, damages usually aim to put the claimant into the position the claimant would be in without the wrong. Even though the main objective of damages is thus the same for each cause of action, their measure is not. While some aspects of the measure of damages are more or less harmonised between contract, tort and equity (e.g. causation in fact and mitigation), significant differences exist in relation to (1) remoteness of damage, which is the question of whether, when and to which degree damage needs to be foreseeable to be recoverable; (2) the compensability of non-pecuniary loss such as pain and suffering, distress and loss of reputation; (3) the effect of contributory negligence, which is the victim's contribution to the occurrence of the wrong or the ensuing loss through unreasonable conduct prior to the wrong; (4) the circumstances under which victims of wrongs can claim the gain the wrongdoer has made from the wrong; and (5) the availability and scope of exemplary (or punitive) damages. For each of the five topics, this book examines the present position in contract, tort and equity and establishes the differences between the three areas. It goes on to scrutinise the arguments in defence of existing differences. The conclusion on each topic is that the present differences between contract, tort and equity cannot be justified on merits and should be removed through a harmonisation of the relevant principles. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9781841138633. Keywords : RECHT.…

Condición: New. Brand New Original US Edition. Customer service! Satisfaction Guaranteed.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide.

Condición: Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. pp. 552.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. pp. 552.

Paperback. Condición: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Condición: New. This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages. Num Pages: 364 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: LNAC14; LNCJ; LNV. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 243 x 166 x 27. Weight in Grams: 700. . 2010. Hardback. . . . .…

Condición: New. pp. 552.

Hardback. Condición: New. 1st. This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages. Damages are defined as the monetary award made by a court in consequence of a breach of contract, a tort or an equitable wrong. In all these causes of action, damages usually aim to put the claimant into the position the claimant would be in without the wrong. Even though the main objective of damages is thus the same for each cause of action, their measure is not. While some aspects of the measure of damages are more or less harmonised between contract, tort and equity (e.g. causation in fact and mitigation), significant differences exist in relation to (1) remoteness of damage, which is the question of whether, when and to which degree damage needs to be foreseeable to be recoverable; (2) the compensability of non-pecuniary loss such as pain and suffering, distress and loss of reputation; (3) the effect of contributory negligence, which is the victim's contribution to the occurrence of the wrong or the ensuing loss through unreasonable conduct prior to the wrong; (4) the circumstances under which victims of wrongs can claim the gain the wrongdoer has made from the wrong; and (5) the availability and scope of exemplary (or punitive) damages.For each of the five topics, this book examines the present position in contract, tort and equity and establishes the differences between the three areas. It goes on to scrutinise the arguments in defence of existing differences. The conclusion on each topic is that the present differences between contract, tort and equity cannot be justified on merits and should be removed through a harmonisation of the relevant principles.…

Hardback. Condición: New. This insightful book outlines the remedies for private law wrongs such as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of trust and torts. With a focus on English law, it provides an accessible, up-to-date and commercially centred overview of this complex field.Katy Barnett and Sirko Harder discuss remedies at common law, in equity and under statute. The remedies are primarily organised according to their function: first, compensation for loss, then coercive, vindicatory, restitutionary and gain-based remedies and finally, proprietary remedies. Private Law Remedies examines the general principles in remedies law and highlights the commonalities and differences among the various private law wrongs. While the focus is on English law, some developments in other common law countries are also mentioned.Students and scholars of private and commercial law will greatly benefit from this clear and accessible book. It is also a vital resource for overseas lawyers who are seeking to understand private law remedies in English law, as well as policymakers, judges and commercial litigators.…

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 416 pages. 9.25x6.12x1.10 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages. Num Pages: 364 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: LNAC14; LNCJ; LNV. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 243 x 166 x 27. Weight in Grams: 700. . 2010. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.…

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 3rd edition. 708 pages. 9.61x6.69x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Gebunden. Condición: New. This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages.&Uumlber den AutorSirko Harder is a Senior Lecturer at Monash University, Melbourne.Inha.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages. Damages are defined as the monetary award made by a court in consequence of a breach of contract, a tort or an equitable wrong. In all these causes of action, damages usually aim to put the claimant into the position the claimant would be in without the wrong. Even though the main objective of damages is thus the same for each cause of action, their measure is not.While some aspects of the measure of damages are more or less harmonised between contract, tort and equity (e.g. causation in fact and mitigation), significant differences exist in relation to(1) remoteness of damage, which is the question of whether, when and to which degree damage needs to be foreseeable to be recoverable;(2) the compensability of non-pecuniary loss such as pain and suffering, distress and loss of reputation;(3) the effect of contributory negligence, which is the victim's contribution to the occurrence of the wrong or the ensuing loss through unreasonable conduct prior to the wrong;(4) the circumstances under which victims of wrongs can claim the gain the wrongdoer has made from the wrong; and(5) the availability and scope of exemplary (or punitive) damages.For each of the five topics, this book examines the present position in contract, tort and equity and establishes the differences between the three areas. It goes on to scrutinise the arguments in defence of existing differences. The conclusion on each topic is that the present differences between contract, tort and equity cannot be justified on merits and should be removed through a harmonisation of the relevant principles.…

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 394 pages. 9.25x5.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Hardback. Condición: New. 1st. This book challenges certain differences between contract, tort and equity in relation to the measure (in a broad sense) of damages. Damages are defined as the monetary award made by a court in consequence of a breach of contract, a tort or an equitable wrong. In all these causes of action, damages usually aim to put the claimant into the position the claimant would be in without the wrong. Even though the main objective of damages is thus the same for each cause of action, their measure is not. While some aspects of the measure of damages are more or less harmonised between contract, tort and equity (e.g. causation in fact and mitigation), significant differences exist in relation to (1) remoteness of damage, which is the question of whether, when and to which degree damage needs to be foreseeable to be recoverable; (2) the compensability of non-pecuniary loss such as pain and suffering, distress and loss of reputation; (3) the effect of contributory negligence, which is the victim's contribution to the occurrence of the wrong or the ensuing loss through unreasonable conduct prior to the wrong; (4) the circumstances under which victims of wrongs can claim the gain the wrongdoer has made from the wrong; and (5) the availability and scope of exemplary (or punitive) damages.For each of the five topics, this book examines the present position in contract, tort and equity and establishes the differences between the three areas. It goes on to scrutinise the arguments in defence of existing differences. The conclusion on each topic is that the present differences between contract, tort and equity cannot be justified on merits and should be removed through a harmonisation of the relevant principles.…

Hardback. Condición: New. This insightful book outlines the remedies for private law wrongs such as breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of trust and torts. With a focus on English law, it provides an accessible, up-to-date and commercially centred overview of this complex field.Katy Barnett and Sirko Harder discuss remedies at common law, in equity and under statute. The remedies are primarily organised according to their function: first, compensation for loss, then coercive, vindicatory, restitutionary and gain-based remedies and finally, proprietary remedies. Private Law Remedies examines the general principles in remedies law and highlights the commonalities and differences among the various private law wrongs. While the focus is on English law, some developments in other common law countries are also mentioned.Students and scholars of private and commercial law will greatly benefit from this clear and accessible book. It is also a vital resource for overseas lawyers who are seeking to understand private law remedies in English law, as well as policymakers, judges and commercial litigators.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Remedies in Australian Private Law presents a detailed and scholarly map of remedies under Australian private law. Clearly structured and accessibly written, the text takes a black-letter law approach to remedies in common law, equity and statute, and develops a framework for understanding the principles of private law remedies and their practical application. The third edition has been updated to include recent cases in remedial law, offering students clear links between principles and practice, and provides more in-depth coverage of compensation under the Australian Consumer Law. Reasonable fee awards and disgorgement and accounts of profit are now addressed in separate chapters to reflect recent changes in international case law. Written by an expert author team, Remedies in Australian Private Law enables students and practitioners to develop a coherent understanding of remedial law and to analyse legal problems and identify appropriate remedial solutions.…