9780521176590 - Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (21 resultados)

Paperback. Condición: Fair. No Jacket. Readable copy. Pages may have considerable notes/highlighting. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Condición: Like New. First Edition. In nearly new condition: firm and square with strong joints, no creases. Just a few hardly noticeable rubs or very mild bumps. Hence a non-text page shows a small 'damaged' stamp. Despite such this book looks and feels unread. Thus the contents are crisp, fresh and tight. And so a very nice book in great condition, now offered for sale at a reasonable price.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: New. Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts - statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law - since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention.

Condición: New. In.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. A collection of essays examining the judicial decision-making process under the Human Rights Act 1998. Editor(s): Fenwick, Helen; Phillipson, Gavin P.; Masterman, Roger. Num Pages: 484 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 1DBKE; 1DBKW; LNAA; LNDA; LNDC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 158 x 228 x 30. Weight in Grams: 714. . 2011. 1st Edition. paperback. . . . .

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. A collection of essays examining the judicial decision-making process under the Human Rights Act 1998. Editor(s): Fenwick, Helen; Phillipson, Gavin P.; Masterman, Roger. Num Pages: 484 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 1DBKE; 1DBKW; LNAA; LNDA; LNDC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 158 x 228 x 30. Weight in Grams: 714. . 2011. 1st Edition. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts - statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law - since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention.

Paperback. Condición: New. Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts - statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law - since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention.

Paperback. Condición: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention. A collection of essays examining judicial decision-making under the Human Rights Act 1998. Focusing on content and process, it considers changes in the substantive law and the new processes of judicial reasoning being adopted. The uses of such concepts are examined, as are the modes of reasoning adopted by judges. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 1st edition. 483 pages. 8.90x5.98x1.26 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. 484 2:B&W 6 x 9 in or 229 x 152 mm Perfect Bound on Creme w/Gloss Lam.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 484.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention. A collection of essays examining judicial decision-making under the Human Rights Act 1998. Focusing on content and process, it considers changes in the substantive law and the new processes of judicial reasoning being adopted. The uses of such concepts are examined, as are the modes of reasoning adopted by judges. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. A collection of essays examining judicial decision-making under the Human Rights Act 1998. Focusing on content and process, it considers changes in the substantive law and the new processes of judicial reasoning being adopted. The uses of such concepts are .