ISBN: 9780300219906 - the origins of reasonable doubt: theological roots of the criminal trial (yale law library series in legal history and reference) (28 resultados)

Condición: Good. A copy that has been read, but remains in clean condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact (including dust cover, if applicable). The spine may show signs of wear. Pages can include limited notes and highlighting, and the copy can include "From the library of" labels or limited small stickers. Book may have a remainder mark or be a price cutter.…

paperback. Condición: Very Good.

paperback. Condición: Good. A little highlighting, else pages clean, unmarked. Cover has light wear. Shipped promptly with tracking.

Paperback. Condición: New. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 3-4 days from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. To be convicted of a crime in the United States, a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one. The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. …

Paperback. Condición: New. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 24-48 hours from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: new.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: New. Series: Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference. Num Pages: 288 pages, 8 b/w illus. BIC Classification: LAF; LNF. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 235 x 156. . . 2016. Reprint. Paperback. . . . .

Paperback. Condición: New. To be convicted of a crime in the United States, a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one. The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice.…

Condición: New. pp. 288.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. reprint edition. 276 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. Series: Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference. Num Pages: 288 pages, 8 b/w illus. BIC Classification: LAF; LNF. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 235 x 156. . . 2016. Reprint. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condición: New. pp. 288.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. To be convicted of a crime in the United States, a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one. The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. …

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - To be convicted of a crime in the United States, a person must be proven guilty 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' But what is reasonable doubt Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of 'reasonable doubt.' It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one. …

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. To be convicted of a crime in the United States, a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one. The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. …

Condición: NEW.

Condición: Very Good. Envoi rapide très bon état avec sa jaquette (un peu insolée) intérieur propre bonne tenue. 16 2x2 8x23 8cm. 2008. Cartonné jaquette. 276 pages. Very Good.

Condición: New.

Buch. Condición: Neu. The Origins of Reasonable Doubt - Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial | James Q. Whitman | Buch | Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference | Einband - flex.(Paperback) | Englisch | 2016 | KNV Besorgung | EAN 9780300219906 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. …

Paperback. Condición: New. To be convicted of a crime in the United States, a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one. The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice.…