ISBN: 9780262549578 - arguments that count: physics, computing, and missile defense, 1949-2012 (inside technology) (19 resultados)

Condición: New.

Paperback or Softback. Condición: New. Arguments that Count: Physics, Computing, and Missile Defense, 1949-2012. Book.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: New. 2023. paperback. . . . . .

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 344 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.76 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. 2023. paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Paperback. Condición: New.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Rebecca Slayton is a Lecturer in Public Policy and Junior Faculty Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University.How differing assessments of risk by physicists and computer scientists have influenced public de.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - How differing assessments of risk by physicists and computer scientists have influenced public debate over nuclear defense.In a rapidly changing world, we rely upon experts to assess the promise and risks of new technology. But how do these experts make sense of a highly uncertain future In Arguments that Count, Rebecca Slayton offers an important new perspective. Drawing on new historical documents and interviews as well as perspectives in science and technology studies, she provides an original account of how scientists came to terms with the unprecedented threat of nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). She compares how two different professional communitiesphysicists and computer scientistsconstructed arguments about the risks of missile defense, and how these arguments changed over time. Slayton shows that our understanding of technological risks is shaped by disciplinary repertoiresthe codified knowledge and mathematical rules that experts use to frame new challenges. And, significantly, a new repertoire can bring long-neglected risks into clear view.In the 1950s, scientists recognized that high-speed computers would be needed to cope with the unprecedented speed of ICBMs. But the nation's elite science advisors had no way to analyze the risks of computers so used physics to assess what they could: radar and missile performance. Only decades later, after establishing computing as a science, were advisors able to analyze authoritatively the risks associated with complex softwaremost notably, the risk of a catastrophic failure. As we continue to confront new threats, including that of cyber attack, Slayton offers valuable insight into how different kinds of expertise can limit or expand our capacity to address novel technological risks.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Arguments that Count | Physics, Computing, and Missile Defense, 1949-2012 | Rebecca Slayton | Taschenbuch | Einband - flex.(Paperback) | Englisch | 2023 | MIT Press | EAN 9780262549578 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …