Schaafsma sierd j (15 resultados)

Hardcover. Condición: Very Good.

Condición: new.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. 2022. Hardback. . . . . .

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: New.

Hardback. Condición: New. The world of intellectual property (patents, trade marks, copyrights, et cetera) is becoming increasingly international. More and more frequently, disputes about intellectual property have an international character. This inevitably raises questions of private international law: which national court is competent to adjudicate an international dispute of this kind? And which national law should be applied to an international case of this kind? Since the 1990s, the first question in particular has attracted attention; in recent years, the focus has shifted to the second question: which national law is applicable? Opinions differ widely on this matter today. The controversy focuses on the question whether the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention, the two most important treaties on intellectual property, contain a rule that designates the applicable law. In other words: do these treaties contain a 'conflict-of-law rule' as it is called? This question, which concerns nearly all countries in the world, is nowadays considered to be 'heftig umstritten' (fiercely contested) and 'très difficile' (very difficult). And that is where we come across something strange: today it may be fiercely contested whether these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, but in the past, for the nineteenth-century authors of these treaties, it was perfectly self-evident that these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, namely in the 'principle of national treatment' as it is called. How is that possible? These are the fundamental questions at the heart of this book: does the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention contain a conflict-of-law rule? And if so, why do we no longer understand this conflict-of-law rule today?This book is an English translation of Sierd J. Schaafsma's groundbreaking book, which appeared in Dutch in 2009 (now updated with the most significant case law and legislation).Key features include:provides deep insight into the current state of affairs in international intellectual property lawextensive and groundbreaking analysis of the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Conventiondetailed and authoritative explanation of the intersection of the conflicts of law and intellectual property law.…

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 570 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. The world of intellectual property (patents, trade marks, copyrights, et cetera) is becoming increasingly international. More and more frequently, disputes about intellectual property have an international character. This inevitably raises questions of private international law: which national court is competent to adjudicate an international dispute of this kind? And which national law should be applied to an international case of this kind? Since the 1990s, the first question in particular has attracted attention; in recent years, the focus has shifted to the second question: which national law is applicable? Opinions differ widely on this matter today. The controversy focuses on the question whether the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention, the two most important treaties on intellectual property, contain a rule that designates the applicable law. In other words: do these treaties contain a 'conflict-of-law rule' as it is called? This question, which concerns nearly all countries in the world, is nowadays considered to be heftig umstritten (fiercely contested) and tres difficile (very difficult). And that is where we come across something strange: today it may be fiercely contested whether these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, but in the past, for the nineteenth-century authors of these treaties, it was perfectly self-evident that these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, namely in the principle of national treatment as it is called. How is that possible? These are the fundamental questions at the heart of this book: does the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention contain a conflict-of-law rule? And if so, why do we no longer understand this conflict-of-law rule today?This book is an English translation of Sierd J. Schaafsmas groundbreaking book, which appeared in Dutch in 2009 (now updated with the most significant case law and legislation).Key features include:provides deep insight into the current state of affairs in international intellectual property lawextensive and groundbreaking analysis of the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Conventiondetailed and authoritative explanation of the intersection of the conflicts of law and intellectual property law. Translation of the author's 2009 work by Chris P. Odijk and Xandra Lammers (Foreword). Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Condición: New.

Condición: New. 2022. Hardback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardback. Condición: New. The world of intellectual property (patents, trade marks, copyrights, et cetera) is becoming increasingly international. More and more frequently, disputes about intellectual property have an international character. This inevitably raises questions of private international law: which national court is competent to adjudicate an international dispute of this kind? And which national law should be applied to an international case of this kind? Since the 1990s, the first question in particular has attracted attention; in recent years, the focus has shifted to the second question: which national law is applicable? Opinions differ widely on this matter today. The controversy focuses on the question whether the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention, the two most important treaties on intellectual property, contain a rule that designates the applicable law. In other words: do these treaties contain a 'conflict-of-law rule' as it is called? This question, which concerns nearly all countries in the world, is nowadays considered to be 'heftig umstritten' (fiercely contested) and 'très difficile' (very difficult). And that is where we come across something strange: today it may be fiercely contested whether these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, but in the past, for the nineteenth-century authors of these treaties, it was perfectly self-evident that these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, namely in the 'principle of national treatment' as it is called. How is that possible? These are the fundamental questions at the heart of this book: does the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention contain a conflict-of-law rule? And if so, why do we no longer understand this conflict-of-law rule today?This book is an English translation of Sierd J. Schaafsma's groundbreaking book, which appeared in Dutch in 2009 (now updated with the most significant case law and legislation).Key features include:provides deep insight into the current state of affairs in international intellectual property lawextensive and groundbreaking analysis of the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Conventiondetailed and authoritative explanation of the intersection of the conflicts of law and intellectual property law.…

Buch. Condición: Neu. Neuware.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. The world of intellectual property (patents, trade marks, copyrights, et cetera) is becoming increasingly international. More and more frequently, disputes about intellectual property have an international character. This inevitably raises questions of private international law: which national court is competent to adjudicate an international dispute of this kind? And which national law should be applied to an international case of this kind? Since the 1990s, the first question in particular has attracted attention; in recent years, the focus has shifted to the second question: which national law is applicable? Opinions differ widely on this matter today. The controversy focuses on the question whether the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention, the two most important treaties on intellectual property, contain a rule that designates the applicable law. In other words: do these treaties contain a 'conflict-of-law rule' as it is called? This question, which concerns nearly all countries in the world, is nowadays considered to be heftig umstritten (fiercely contested) and tres difficile (very difficult). And that is where we come across something strange: today it may be fiercely contested whether these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, but in the past, for the nineteenth-century authors of these treaties, it was perfectly self-evident that these treaties contain a conflict-of-law rule, namely in the principle of national treatment as it is called. How is that possible? These are the fundamental questions at the heart of this book: does the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Convention contain a conflict-of-law rule? And if so, why do we no longer understand this conflict-of-law rule today?This book is an English translation of Sierd J. Schaafsmas groundbreaking book, which appeared in Dutch in 2009 (now updated with the most significant case law and legislation).Key features include:provides deep insight into the current state of affairs in international intellectual property lawextensive and groundbreaking analysis of the principle of national treatment in the Berne Convention and the Paris Conventiondetailed and authoritative explanation of the intersection of the conflicts of law and intellectual property law. Translation of the author's 2009 work by Chris P. Odijk and Xandra Lammers (Foreword). Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.…