Heather logue (21 resultados)

Paperback. Condición: Fair. No Jacket. Readable copy. Pages may have considerable notes/highlighting. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Condición: Very Good. Minimal shelf wear, clean internals. Remainder mark.

Condición: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Library sticker on front cover. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,600grams, ISBN:9780262524902.…

Soft cover. Condición: Fine. Softcover. xxx,334. Fine condition. A little dust at the top edge. One small spot at the bottom edge. Minor ordinary shelfwear to the covers and edges. If you order this from outside the United States, we are almost certain to request an additional payment to help cover the postage. Dimensions: 6 x 9 x .625 inches. Weight: 493 grams. Every order includes tracking and is wrapped and robustly packaged with care in Tucson, AZ. ~Mesquite Booksellers.…

Condición: New. Brand New.

Condición: Very Good.

Condición: New.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: new.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Contemporary philosophy of perception is dominated by highly polarized debates. The polarization is particularly acute in the debate between naive realist disjunctivists and their opponents, but divisions seem almost as stark in other areas of dispute, for example, the debate over whether we experience so-called 'high-level' properties, and the debate concerning individuation of the senses. The guiding hypothesis underlying this volume is that such polarizationstems from insufficient attention to how we should go about settling these debates. In general, there is widespread, largely implicit disagreement concerning what philosophical theories of perception aresupposed to explain, the claims that we should hold fixed in the course of theorizing, and the methods that such theorizing should employ. The goal of this volume is to move such methodological questions from the background to the front of the debate, in the hope of facilitating progress. The contributions constitute an initial effort to spur more explicit, systematic discussion of methodology in philosophy of perception, covering a wide range of relevant topics, from the relation betweenscientific and philosophical theorizing about perception, to lessons we can learn from the history of philosophy of perception. This volume presents a collection of chapters examining fundamental assumptions of contemporary debates in the philosophy of perception. The chapters cover a wide range of topics, from the relation between scientific and philosophical theorizing about perception, to lessons we can learn from the history of philosophy of perception. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Condición: New.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 304 pages. 9.49x6.34x0.94 inches. In Stock.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Hardback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 304 pages. 9.49x6.34x0.94 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New.

Condición: gut. 2009. Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings (MIT Readers in Contemporary Philosophy) In englischer Sprache. pages.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Contemporary philosophy of perception is dominated by highly polarized debates. The polarization is particularly acute in the debate between naïve realist disjunctivists and their opponents, but divisions seem almost as stark in other areas of dispute, for example, the debate over whether we experience so-called 'high-level' properties, and the debate concerning individuation of the senses. The guiding hypothesis underlying this volume is that such polarization stems from insufficient attention to how we should go about settling these debates. In general, there is widespread, largely implicit disagreement concerning what philosophical theories of perception are supposed to explain, the claims that we should hold fixed in the course of theorizing, and the methods that such theorizing should employ. The goal of this volume is to move such methodological questions from the background to the front of the debate, in the hope of facilitating progress. The contributions constitute an initial effort to spur more explicit, systematic discussion of methodology in philosophy of perception, covering a wide range of relevant topics, from the relation between scientific and philosophical theorizing about perception, to lessons we can learn from the history of philosophy of perception. …