dauchy serge (80 resultados)

Softcover. Condición: Très bon. Ancien livre de bibliothèque avec équipements. Edition 2016. Ammareal reverse jusqu'à 15% du prix net de cet article à des organisations caritatives. ENGLISH DESCRIPTION Book Condition: Used, Very good. Former library book. Edition 2016. Ammareal gives back up to 15% of this item's net price to charity organizations.

Condición: AS NEW. Etat de NEUF / AS NEW condition 9782753527317 9782753527317 1048C 1.

paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: Neuf.

Condición: Neuf.

Condición: very good. Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2010. Paperback. 238 pp. (Comparative studies in continental and Anglo-American legal history, Band 25/2). - Ratio decidendi is a technical legal term of art in Anglo-American jurisprudence, a concept opposed to the idea of obiter dictum. Ratio decidendi is the reason of the judge in coming to a judicial decision in a lawsuit presented to the court by the litigants for an official decision. Obiter dictum is whatever else a judge might say in passing. This concept of ratio decidendi operated very differently in the different nations of Western Europe and their former colonies at different periods of early-modern history as is demonstrated in the first volume (25/1) which was published in 2006. The second volume focuses on a specific aspect of ratio decidendi: the use by the courts of foreign law as the basis of their decisions when appropriate to the issues to be decided in a particular case brought to them by the litigants. The term foreign law refers to law that is not part of the law binding upon the court, in other words law outside the court's system of jurisprudence. Thus, one must consider what is domestic law in order to discern what is foreign to, or outside of, it. These comparative essays thus center on what law is foreign in various continental and Anglo-American legal systems from the Middle Ages until the 20th century and how it supports legal arguments and decisions. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9783428134335. Keywords : RECHT, history of law, Germany.

Soft Cover. Condición: Very Good. pp. 93 - Travaux et recherches de l'Université de Droit d'Économie et de Sciences Sociales de Paris. Série sciences historiques n° 26 - Paris II Size: 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall.

Paperback. 202 pp.; ills.; 24x16 cm. "Societe d'Histoire du Droit et des Institutions des Pays Flamands, Picards et Wallons". Text in French / Français. Dedication copy, signed Serge Dauchy. - (small signs of use) Although very good, see picture 340g.

Hardcover. Condición: Good. No Jacket. 2020 hardcover published without jacket/the first 52 pages bumped at the upper corners/clean & unmarked. 442 p.

Soft Cover. Condición: Very Good. = Klasse der Letteren. Jaargang 57, 1995, Nr. 154. pp. VI + 328 Size: 4to - over 9¾" - 12" tall. Signed by Author.

Condición: as new. Paris : IRJS éditions, [2014]. Paperback. ix,229 pp. (Bibliothèque de l'Institut de recherche juridique de la Sorbonne-André Tunc, 52). Condition : as new copy. ISBN 9782919211302. Keywords : RECHT, civil procedural law history of law.

Condición: very good. Preface de J. Hilaire. Paris : PUF, 1988. Paperback. 93 pp. (Travaux et recherches de l'Université de Droit, d'Économie et de Sciences Sociales de Paris II. Série sciences historiques ; 26). French text. With a dedication by the author. - This study by Serge Dauchy offers a detailed historical analysis of two exceptional legal remedies in French civil procedure - the proposition d'erreur and the requête civile - from the Ordonnance de Saint Louis (13th century) to the Ordonnance civile of 1667. Drawing on archival sources from the Parlement de Paris, Dauchy reconstructs the evolution of these remedies, showing how the proposition d'erreur, the accusation by one of the parties that the court itself had committed a legal error in its final judgment, originally dominant, became rigid and risk-laden, leading to the rise of the more adaptable requête civile, the possibility to reopen a case after judgment if new facts or serious procedural errors emerged, in the 16th century. This shift reflects broader procedural reforms and changing attitudes toward judicial error and finality. The study culminates with the 1667 Ordinance, which codifies and limits these remedies, laying the groundwork for modern appeal systems like cassation. Dauchy combines legal theory, judicial practice, and historical sources, including original pleadings and judgments, to trace how these extraordinary procedures shaped early modern French justice and procedural law. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9782130423492. Keywords : RECHT, *2006-100 rechtsgeschiedenis.

paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: very good. Brussel : AWLSK, 1995. Paperback. 328 pp. (Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren ; Jaarg. 57, 1995, nr. 154). Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9789065696236. Keywords : RECHT, history of law.

Soft Cover. Condición: Very Good. 207 p. Size: 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall.

Condición: Neuf.

Condición: Neuf.

Soft Cover. Condición: As New. = Actes des Journées internationales de la Société d'Histoire du Droit et des Institutions des pays flamands, picards et wallons tenues à Ath du 25 au 28 mai 1995 - pp. 212 Size: 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall.

Couverture souple. Condición: Très bon. 1 volume broché, 306 pages. Société d'histoire du droit et des institutions des pays flamands, picards et wallons. Actes des Journées internationales tenues à Versailles du 1er au 4 juin 2000. Envoi autographe signé par Catherine Lecomte. Très bel exemplaire ( Photographies sur demande / We can send pictures of this book on simple request ).

hardcover. Condición: New. Brand new. Ships from Friends bookstore to benefit Beaverton (Oregon) library.

Condición: Gut. 93, (5) Seiten. Einband leicht berieben. - Insgesamt sauberes und gutes Exemplar. - Sans défauts significatifs. - En bon état. Sprache: Französisch Gewicht in Gramm: 990 Gr. 8° (24,5 x 16 cm), Orig.-Broschur. [Softcover / Paperback].

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Ratio decidendi is a technical legal term of art in Anglo-American jurisprudence, a concept opposed to the idea of obiter dictum. Ratio decidendi is the reason of the judge in coming to a judicial decision in a lawsuit presented to the court by the litigants for an official decision. Obiter dictum is whatever else a judge might say in passing. This concept of ratio decidendi operated very differently in the different nations of Western Europe and their former colonies at different periods of early-modern history as is demonstrated in the first volume (25/1) which was published in 2006.The second volume focuses on a specific aspect of ratio decidendi: the use by the courts of foreign law as the basis of their decisions when appropriate to the issues to be decided in a particular case brought to them by the litigants. The term foreign law refers to law that is not part of the law binding upon the court, in other words law outside the court's system of jurisprudence. Thus, one must consider what is domestic law in order to discern what is foreign to, or outside of, it. These comparative essays thus center on what law is foreign in various continental and Anglo-American legal systems from the Middle Ages until the 20th century and how it supports legal arguments and decisions.; Ratio decidendi is a technical legal term of art in Anglo-American jurisprudence, a concept opposed to the idea of obiter dictum. Ratio decidendi is the reason of the judge in coming to a judicial decision in a lawsuit presented to the court by the litigants for an official decision. Obiter dictum is whatever else a judge might say in passing. This concept of ratio decidendi operated very differently in the different nations of Western Europe and their former colonies at different periods of early-modern history as is demonstrated in the first volume (25/1) which was published in 2006.The second volume focuses on a specific aspect of ratio decidendi: the use by the courts of foreign law as the basis of their decisions when appropriate to the issues to be decided in a particular case brought to them by the litigants. The term foreign law refers to law that is not part of the law binding upon the court, in other words law outside the court's system of jurisprudence. Thus, one must consider what is domestic law in order to discern what is foreign to, or outside of, it. These comparative essays thus center on what law is foreign in various continental and Anglo-American legal systems from the Middle Ages until the 20th century and how it supports legal arguments and decisions.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware -Although the problem of ratio decidendi concerns the essence of law and justice, very little comparative work between the Continental and Anglo-American legal systems has been done on the topic. Legal literature often repeats that it is one of the sharpest points of contrast between the two legal cultures. Within the English speaking legal system, multiple opinions, both concurring and dissenting, prevail where dissent among Continental judges only occurs behind closed doors: the published decision indeed is always presented as the single and incontestable opinion of the whole court. Historical reasons are generally put forward to explain that contrast. Where in the Anglo-American Common Law system judges are asked - and always have been asked - to present the materials and reasons upon which they based their judicial opinions, in Ancien Régime continental Europe it was not considered necessary to formulate the reasons of a decision and in most courts of the European Continent it was even formally forbidden to the judges, until the end of the eighteenth century, to write down or even communicate orally 'the secrets of their discussions and deliberations'.To comparatists, this reveals two different cultures among judges and lawyers. In Continental Europe there is much emphasis on the idea of judging as a science which can be learned and reproduced with an impersonal rigour. The Anglo-American judge is not considered to be such a trained scientist, he is merely a practised craftsman. Can the history of ratio decidendi - but also the history of law and justice from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century - therefore be reduced to a total contradiction between two legal cultures Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9, 12165 Berlin 294 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Although the problem of ratio decidendi concerns the essence of law and justice, very little comparative work between the Continental and Anglo-American legal systems has been done on the topic. Legal literature often repeats that it is one of the sharpest points of contrast between the two legal cultures. Within the English speaking legal system, multiple opinions, both concurring and dissenting, prevail where dissent among Continental judges only occurs behind closed doors: the published decision indeed is always presented as the single and incontestable opinion of the whole court. Historical reasons are generally put forward to explain that contrast. Where in the Anglo-American Common Law system judges are asked - and always have been asked - to present the materials and reasons upon which they based their judicial opinions, in Ancien Régime continental Europe it was not considered necessary to formulate the reasons of a decision and in most courts of the European Continent it was even formally forbidden to the judges, until the end of the eighteenth century, to write down or even communicate orally 'the secrets of their discussions and deliberations'.To comparatists, this reveals two different cultures among judges and lawyers. In Continental Europe there is much emphasis on the idea of judging as a science which can be learned and reproduced with an impersonal rigour. The Anglo-American judge is not considered to be such a trained scientist, he is merely a practised craftsman. Can the history of ratio decidendi - but also the history of law and justice from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century - therefore be reduced to a total contradiction between two legal cultures ; Although the problem of ratio decidendi concerns the essence of law and justice, very little comparative work between the Continental and Anglo-American legal systems has been done on the topic. Legal literature often repeats that it is one of the sharpest points of contrast between the two legal cultures. Within the English speaking legal system, multiple opinions, both concurring and dissenting, prevail where dissent among Continental judges only occurs behind closed doors: the published decision indeed is always presented as the single and incontestable opinion of the whole court. Historical reasons are generally put forward to explain that contrast. Where in the Anglo-American Common Law system judges are asked - and always have been asked - to present the materials and reasons upon which they based their judicial opinions, in Ancien Régime continental Europe it was not considered necessary to formulate the reasons of a decision and in most courts of the European Continent it was even formally forbidden to the judges, until the end of the eighteenth century, to write down or even communicate orally 'the secrets of their discussions and deliberations'.To comparatists, this reveals two different cultures among judges and lawyers. In Continental Europe there is much emphasis on the idea of judging as a science which can be learned and reproduced with an impersonal rigour. The Anglo-American judge is not considered to be such a trained scientist, he is merely a practised craftsman. Can the history of ratio decidendi - but also the history of law and justice from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century - therefore be reduced to a total contradiction between two legal cultures.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. 'Foreign' Law | Serge Dauchy (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | 238 S. | Englisch | 2010 | Duncker & Humblot | EAN 9783428134335 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Anne Fiedler, Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9, 12165 Berlin, info[at]duncker-humblot[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Ratio decidendi. | Guiding Principles of Judicial Decisions. Vol. 1: Case Law. | W. Hamilton Bryson (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | 293 S. | Englisch | 2006 | Duncker & Humblot | EAN 9783428122165 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Anne Fiedler, Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9, 12165 Berlin, info[at]duncker-humblot[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Soft Cover. Condición: Very Good. XXII-304 p. Iuris scripta historica, 13. Size: 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 293 pages. 9.13x6.14x0.63 inches. In Stock.