Costantini r (50 resultados)

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 631 pages. 8.00x5.25x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Condición: Fine.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

dj. First Edition. First Edition, First Printing. Near Fine book in a Good dustjacket.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Hardcover. Condición: Good+. Estado de la sobrecubierta: Good. - Book is in good overall condition. No writing or major blemishes. Average wear. Light smudging to DJ.; - Your satisfaction is our priority. We offer free returns and respond promptly to all inquiries. Your item will be packaged with care and ship on the same or next business day. Buy with confidence.…

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Softcover/Paperback. Condición: Gut. 142 p. ; ill. Noch guter Zustand. Hinterer Buchdeckel stark fleckig, Einband mit 2 zusätzlichen Fotos foliert. Seiten sauber. / Still good. Back cover heavily stained, cover laminated with two additional photographs. Clean pages. Sprache: Italienisch Gewicht in Gramm: 300.…

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Paper Back. Condición: Very Good. The page edges have minor tanning. 338 pages. Books listed here are not stored at the shop. Please contact us if you want to pick up a book from Newtown. Size: Size F: 9"-10" Tall (228-254mm).

Condición: Buono (Good). 3 edizione, un volume in ottime condizioni, copertina rigida con fascettaa, 670 pagine circa, lieve strappo sul dorso della fascetta. Book.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New. pp. 204.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Condición: Near Fine. Estado de la sobrecubierta: Near Fine. 1st Edition. ix, 184 pp. Original cloth. Near Fine, in dust jacket. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 122. An inference may be defined as a passage of thought according to some method. In the theory of knowledge it is customary to distinguish deductive and non-deductive inferences. Deductive inferences are truth preserving, that is, the truth of the premises is preserved in the con­ clusion. As a result, the conclusion of a deductive inference is already 'contained' in the premises, although we may not know this fact until the inference is performed. Standard examples of deductive inferences are taken from logic and mathematics. Non-deductive inferences need not preserve truth, that is, 'thought may pass' from true premises to false conclusions. Such inferences can be expansive, or, ampliative in the sense that the performances of such inferences actually increases our putative knowledge. Standard non-deductive inferences do not really exist, but one may think of elementary inductive inferences in which conclusions regarding the future are drawn from knowledge of the past. Since the body of scientific knowledge is increasing, it is obvious that the method of science must allow non-deductive as well as deductive inferences. Indeed, the explosive growth of science in recent times points to a prominent role for the former. Philosophers of science have long tried to isolate and study the non-deductive inferences in science. The inevitability of such inferences one the one hand, juxtaposed with the poverty of all efforts to identify them, constitutes one of the major cognitive embarrassments of our time. Table of contents (10 chapters) Method, Theory, and Statistics: The Lesson of Physics Lorenz Krüger Pages 1-13 The Theory of Natural Selection as a Null Theory Abner Shimony Pages 15-26 Causality and Exogeneity in Econometric Models Maria Carla Galavotti, Guido Gambetta Pages 27-40 Statistics in Expert Resolution: A Theory of Weights for Combining Expert Opinion Roger M. Cooke Pages 41-72 Short and Long Term Survival Analysis in Oncological Research Ettore Marubini Pages 73-87 A statistical Approach to the Study of Pollen Fitness T. Caliński, E. Ottaviano, M. Sari Gorla Pages 89-101 Statistics in Genetics: Human Migrations Detected by Multivariate Techniques Alberto Piazza Pages 103-118 Quantum Probability and The Foundations of Quantum Theory Luigi Accardi Pages 119-147 Indistinguishability, Interchangeability, and Indeterminism Alexander Bach Pages 149-166 The Non Frequency Approach to Elementary Particle Statistics Domenico Costantini, Ubaldo Garibaldi Pages 167-181.…

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 204 pages. 9.01x5.99x0.46 inches. In Stock.

pp.160, num. ill. b/n a piena pagina. Testi di Pino Cacucci, Mariana Figarella e Gianni Pignat in italiano, inglese, francese. Note biografiche della famosa fotografa. Brossura , cop. Illustrata. Volume nuovo.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - An inference may be defined as a passage of thought according to some method. In the theory of knowledge it is customary to distinguish deductive and non-deductive inferences. Deductive inferences are truth preserving, that is, the truth of the premises is preserved in the con clusion. As a result, the conclusion of a deductive inference is already 'contained' in the premises, although we may not know this fact until the inference is performed. Standard examples of deductive inferences are taken from logic and mathematics. Non-deductive inferences need not preserve truth, that is, 'thought may pass' from true premises to false conclusions. Such inferences can be expansive, or, ampliative in the sense that the performances of such inferences actually increases our putative knowledge. Standard non-deductive inferences do not really exist, but one may think of elementary inductive inferences in which conclusions regarding the future are drawn from knowledge of the past. Since the body of scientific knowledge is increasing, it is obvious that the method of science must allow non-deductive as well as deductive inferences. Indeed, the explosive growth of science in recent times points to a prominent role for the former. Philosophers of science have long tried to isolate and study the non-deductive inferences in science. The inevitability of such inferences one the one hand, juxtaposed with the poverty of all efforts to identify them, constitutes one of the major cognitive embarrassments of our time. …