Blitz marc (116 resultados)

Condición: New.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Hardback. Condición: New. This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology.  Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones?  Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions.  There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others.  Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time.  Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment.  So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy.This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication.  It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. …

Hardback. Condición: New. This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology.  Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones?  Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions.  There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others.  Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time.  Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment.  So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy.This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication.  It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. …

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology. Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones? Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions. There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others. Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time. Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of speech protected by the First Amendment. So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others privacy.This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isnt only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication. It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our bodys perceptual powers and to the constitutions protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call cognitive liberty: Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

hardcover. Condición: New.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 191 pages. 8.27x5.83x7.90 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Softcover-Großformat. Condición: Gut. 214 Seiten; Das hier angebotene Buch stammt aus einer teilaufgelösten wissenschaftlichen Bibliothek und trägt die entsprechenden Kennzeichnungen (Rückenschild, Instituts-Stempel.). Einband leicht staubschmutzig, Seiten alters-/papierbedingt angebräunt; ansonsten ordentlicher Erhaltungszustand; Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 550.…

Condición: New.

Condición: new.

PF. Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New. The proliferation of virtual and augmented reality technologies into society raise significant questions for judges, legal institutions, and policy makers. For example, when should activities that occur in virtual worlds, or virtual images that are projected into real space (that is, augmented reality), count as protected First Amendment 'speech'? When should they instead count as a nuisance or trespass? Under what circumstances would the copying of virtual images infringe intellectual property laws, or the output of intelligent virtual avatars be patentable inventions or works of authorship eligible for copyright? And when should a person (or computer) face legal consequences for allegedly harmful virtual acts?The Research Handbook on the Law of Virtual and Augmented Reality addresses these questions and others, drawing upon free speech doctrine, criminal law, the law of data protection and privacy, and of jurisdiction, as well as upon potential legal rights for increasingly intelligent virtual avatars in VR worlds. The Handbook offers a comprehensive look at challenges to various legal doctrines raised by the emergence - and increasing use of - virtual and augmented reality worlds, and at how existing law in the USA, Europe, and other jurisdictions might apply to these emerging technologies, or evolve to address them. It also considers what legal questions about virtual and augmented reality are likely to be important, not just for judges and legal scholars, but also for the established businesses and start-ups that wish to make use of, and help shape, these important new technologies.This comprehensive Research Handbook will be an invaluable reference to those looking to keep pace with the dynamic field of virtual and augmented reality, including students and researchers studying intellectual property law as well as legal practitioners, computer scientists, engineers, game designers, and business owners.Contributors include: W. Barfield, P.S. Berman, M.J. Blitz, S.J. Blodgett-Ford, J. Danaher, W. Erlank, J.A.T. Fairfield, J. Garon, G. Hallevy, B. Lewis, H.Y.F. Lim, C. Nwaneri, S.R. Peppet, M. Risch, A.L. Rossow, J. Russo, M. Supponen, A.M. Underhill, B.D. Wassom, A. Williams, G. Yadin.…

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New. In English.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: New. 2020. Paperback. . . . . .

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: NEW.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology. Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions. There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others. Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time. Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of speech protected by the First Amendment. So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others privacy.This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn t only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication. It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body s perceptual powers and to the constitution s protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call cognitive liberty: Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind.…

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: New. pp. 144.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 712 pages. 9.75x6.75x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Hardback. Condición: New. This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology.  Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones?  Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions.  There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others.  Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time.  Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment.  So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy.This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication.  It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. …

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 152 pages. 8.50x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.