Amphas mampoua mbow (7 resultados)

Paperback. Condición: Very Good. It's a well-cared-for item that has seen limited use. The item may show minor signs of wear. All the text is legible, with all pages included. It may have slight markings and/or highlighting.

Condición: good. Befriedigend/Good: Durchschnittlich erhaltenes Buch bzw. Schutzumschlag mit Gebrauchsspuren, aber vollständigen Seiten. / Describes the average WORN book or dust jacket that has all the pages present.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This textbook explores modern politics by focusing on how United States power shapes the international system, analyzes the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and highlights transnational security threats like cyberattacks, regional wars, and terrorism that require vital global cooperation. The contemporary international system remains defined by the structural asymmetry of American power, oscillating between the stabilizing capacity of unipolarity and the functional necessity of multilateral collaboration. While structural realists like Kenneth Waltz contend that concentrated power inevitably generates counterbalancing coalitions, the enduring nature of United States primacy suggests a more complex operational reality. Rather than collapsing under the weight of its own preponderance, the post-Cold War order reflects what Samuel P. Huntington conceptualized as a "uni-multipolar" framework-an environment where a singular superpower operates alongside secondary major powers, rendering absolute hegemony unattainable yet sustained decline premature. The collapse of the Soviet Union fundamentally restructured the international arena, leaving the United States with an unprecedented concentration of economic, technological, and military capabilities. Proponents of unipolar stability argue that a dominant power minimizes systemic uncertainty by acting as a global security manager, thereby deterring major power competition and dampening regional conflicts. The magnitude of American military expenditures and technological superiority has raised the costs of counterbalancing to prohibitive levels, obstructing the emergence of a traditional bipolar or multipolar equilibrium. Consequently, the international architecture resists rapid systemic transition, as no singular challenger possesses the comprehensive capacity to displace American primacy. Contemporary American hegemony is mediated by structural interdependencies and transnational imperatives. The United States cannot unilaterally resolve systemic challenges such as nuclear proliferation, regional instability, and transnational terrorism. Effective governance in the twenty-first century necessitates robust bilateral and multilateral security frameworks. By embedding its power within institutional coalitions, Washington seeks to legitimize its strategic objectives and distribute the burdens of global management. This synthesis of dominance and cooperative restraint ultimately dictates that the longevity of American global leadership relies less on coercion than on its capacity to sustain cooperative alliances within an increasingly diffused global order. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. This textbook explores modern politics by focusing on how United States power shapes the international system, analyzes the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and highlights transnational security threats like cyberattacks, regional wars, and terrorism that require vital global cooperation. The contemporary international system remains defined by the structural asymmetry of American power, oscillating between the stabilizing capacity of unipolarity and the functional necessity of multilateral collaboration. While structural realists like Kenneth Waltz contend that concentrated power inevitably generates counterbalancing coalitions, the enduring nature of United States primacy suggests a more complex operational reality. Rather than collapsing under the weight of its own preponderance, the post-Cold War order reflects what Samuel P. Huntington conceptualized as a "uni-multipolar" framework-an environment where a singular superpower operates alongside secondary major powers, rendering absolute hegemony unattainable yet sustained decline premature. The collapse of the Soviet Union fundamentally restructured the international arena, leaving the United States with an unprecedented concentration of economic, technological, and military capabilities. Proponents of unipolar stability argue that a dominant power minimizes systemic uncertainty by acting as a global security manager, thereby deterring major power competition and dampening regional conflicts. The magnitude of American military expenditures and technological superiority has raised the costs of counterbalancing to prohibitive levels, obstructing the emergence of a traditional bipolar or multipolar equilibrium. Consequently, the international architecture resists rapid systemic transition, as no singular challenger possesses the comprehensive capacity to displace American primacy. Contemporary American hegemony is mediated by structural interdependencies and transnational imperatives. The United States cannot unilaterally resolve systemic challenges such as nuclear proliferation, regional instability, and transnational terrorism. Effective governance in the twenty-first century necessitates robust bilateral and multilateral security frameworks. By embedding its power within institutional coalitions, Washington seeks to legitimize its strategic objectives and distribute the burdens of global management. This synthesis of dominance and cooperative restraint ultimately dictates that the longevity of American global leadership relies less on coercion than on its capacity to sustain cooperative alliances within an increasingly diffused global order. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…