Socrates method rethinking elenchus (9 resultados)

Softcover. First Edition, First Printing. Octavo, xiii, 330 pages. In Very Good minus condition. Spine black with orange and white lettering. Bumping and light peeling to board edges. Foxing and scratching to textblock. Highlighting and underlining throughout. Shelved in Socrates. 1411034. Shelved Dupont Bookstore.…

hardcover. Condición: Very Good. Edge wear to jacket. Open Books is a nonprofit social venture that provides literacy experiences for thousands of readers each year through inspiring programs and creative capitalization of books.

Hardcover. Condición: Fine. Near Fine. Although "the Socratic method" is commonly understood as a style of pedagogy involving cross-questioning between teacher and student, there has long been debate among scholars of ancient philosophy about how this method as attributed to Socrates should be defined or, indeed, whether Socrates can be said to have used any single, uniform method at all distinctive to his way of philosophizing. This volume brings together essays by classicists and philosophers examining this controversy anew. The point of departure for many of those engaged in the debate has been the identification of Socratic method with "the elenchus" as a technique of logical argumentation aimed at refuting an interlocutor, which Gregory Vlastos highlighted in an influential article in 1983. The essays in this volume look again at many of the issues to which Vlastos drew attention but also seek to broaden the discussion well beyond the limits of his formulation. Some contributors question the suitability of the elenchus as a general description of how Socrates engages his interlocutors; others trace the historical origins of the kinds of argumentation Socrates employs; others explore methods in addition to the elenchus that Socrates uses; several propose new ways of thinking about Socratic practices. Eight essays focus on specific dialogues, each examining why Plato has Socrates use the particular methods he does in the context defined by the dialogue. Overall, representing a wide range of approaches in Platonic scholarship, the volume aims to enliven and reorient the debate over Socratic method so as to set a new agenda for future research.; 6 X 1 X 9 inches; 344 pages.…

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 342 pages. 9.00x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Essays examine how the 'the Socratic method,' commonly understood as a style of pedagogy involving cross-questioning between teacher and student, should be defined and if Socrates truly employed one uniform method to philosophize.

Condición: Good. Your purchase helps support Sri Lankan Children's Charity 'The Rainbow Centre'. Ex-library, so some stamps and wear, but in good overall condition. Our donations to The Rainbow Centre have helped provide an education and a safe haven to hundreds of children who live in appalling conditions.…

Hardcover. Condición: New. 040015; Collectible Scott, Gary Alan (editor) Does Socrates Have a Method?: Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond SOCRATES METHODOLOGY PHILOSOPHY HISTORY SURVEYS FLAWLESS COPY, BRAND NEW, PRISTINE, NEVER OPENED -- -- DESCRIPTION: "Although 'the Socratic method' is commonly understood as a style of pedagogy involving cross-questioning between teacher and student, there has long been debate among scholars of ancient philosophy about how this method as attributed to Socrates should be defined or, indeed, whether Socrates can be said to have used any single, uniform method at all distinctive to his way of philosophizing. This volume brings together essays by classicists and philosophers examining this controversy anew. The point of departure for many of those engaged in the debate has been the identification of Socratic method with "the elenchus" as a technique of logical argumentation aimed at refuting an interlocutor, which Gregory Vlastos highlighted in an influential article in 1983. The essays in this volume look again at many of the issues to which Vlastos drew attention but also seek to broaden the discussion well beyond the limits of his formulation. Some contributors question the suitability of the elenchus as a general description of how Socrates engages his interlocutors; others trace the historical origins of the kinds of argumentation Socrates employs; others explore methods in addition to the elenchus that Socrates uses; several propose new ways of thinking about Socratic practices. Eight essays focus on specific dialogues, each examining why Plato has Socrates use the particular methods he does in the context defined by the dialogue. Overall, representing a wide range of approaches in Platonic scholarship, the volume aims to enliven and reorient the debate over Socratic method so as to set a new agenda for future research. Contributors are Hayden W. Ausland, Hugh H. Benson, Thomas C. Brickhouse, Michelle Carpenter, John M. Carvalho, Lloyd P. Gerson, Francisco J. Gonzalez, James H. Lesher, Mark L. McPherran, Ronald M. Polansky, Francois Renaud, and W. Thomas Schmid, Nicholas D. Smith, P. Christopher Smith, Harold Tarrant, Joanne B. Waugh, and Charles M. Young." -- AUTHORS: Gary Alan Scott is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Loyola College in Maryland.…

Hardcover. Condición: New. T-Scogahc; Gary Alan Scott (editor) Does Socrates Have a Method?: Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond METHODOLOGY SOCRATES PHILOSOPHY HISTORY SURVEYS.

Paperback. Condición: New. T-Scogara; Gary Alan Scott (editor) Does Socrates Have a Method?: Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond METHODOLOGY SOCRATES PHILOSOPHY HISTORY SURVEYS.