Isbn: 9798197720511 - beyond reasonable doubt: how mens rea and the burden of proof were systematically dismantled: 8 (the people's law library) (4 resultados)

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Two principles have governed Western criminal law for more than two thousand years. The first is mens rea - the requirement that before any person can be convicted of a crime, the prosecution must prove not just that they did something but that they did it with a guilty mind. The second is the beyond a reasonable doubt standard - the constitutional requirement that the government must prove every element of every charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt before any American citizen can lose their liberty. Both principles are under sustained assault. Most defendants never know it until it is too late.This book delivers the most comprehensive guide available to the two most fundamental protections in American criminal law. Drawing on Supreme Court decisions from Morissette to Rehaif, on the National Registry of Exonerations, and on the real cases of real people prosecuted for conduct they had no idea was criminal, this book traces exactly how the mens rea requirement and the reasonable doubt standard have been systematically dismantled - and exactly what defendants, defense attorneys, and citizens can do about it.Inside: the complete history of the mens rea principle from Roman law through the Model Penal Code; the four mental states and what the prosecution must prove for each; how strict liability offenses have expanded to reach fishermen, guitar manufacturers, maintenance engineers, and healthcare providers who had no idea they were committing any crime; the Staples three-factor test for challenging strict liability prosecution; the Rehaif knowledge principle that has already changed hundreds of federal firearms cases; the constitutional dimensions of the reasonable doubt standard and how jury instructions, appellate deference, and the plea system have weakened it; and the complete practical guide - pre-trial motions, Rule 29 motions, jury instruction requests with specific language and authority, and appellate arguments - for asserting these protections at every stage of every criminal proceeding.The government must prove what you did. It must also prove what you intended. It must prove both beyond a reasonable doubt. This book hands every defendant, every defense attorney, and every citizen who believes the government must earn its convictions the complete legal arsenal to demand exactly that.…

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Two principles have governed Western criminal law for more than two thousand years. The first is mens rea - the requirement that before any person can be convicted of a crime, the prosecution must prove not just that they did something but that they did it with a guilty mind. The second is the beyond a reasonable doubt standard - the constitutional requirement that the government must prove every element of every charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt before any American citizen can lose their liberty. Both principles are under sustained assault. Most defendants never know it until it is too late.This book delivers the most comprehensive guide available to the two most fundamental protections in American criminal law. Drawing on Supreme Court decisions from Morissette to Rehaif, on the National Registry of Exonerations, and on the real cases of real people prosecuted for conduct they had no idea was criminal, this book traces exactly how the mens rea requirement and the reasonable doubt standard have been systematically dismantled - and exactly what defendants, defense attorneys, and citizens can do about it.Inside: the complete history of the mens rea principle from Roman law through the Model Penal Code; the four mental states and what the prosecution must prove for each; how strict liability offenses have expanded to reach fishermen, guitar manufacturers, maintenance engineers, and healthcare providers who had no idea they were committing any crime; the Staples three-factor test for challenging strict liability prosecution; the Rehaif knowledge principle that has already changed hundreds of federal firearms cases; the constitutional dimensions of the reasonable doubt standard and how jury instructions, appellate deference, and the plea system have weakened it; and the complete practical guide - pre-trial motions, Rule 29 motions, jury instruction requests with specific language and authority, and appellate arguments - for asserting these protections at every stage of every criminal proceeding.The government must prove what you did. It must also prove what you intended. It must prove both beyond a reasonable doubt. This book hands every defendant, every defense attorney, and every citizen who believes the government must earn its convictions the complete legal arsenal to demand exactly that. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Two principles have governed Western criminal law for more than two thousand years. The first is mens rea - the requirement that before any person can be convicted of a crime, the prosecution must prove not just that they did something but that they did it with a guilty mind. The second is the beyond a reasonable doubt standard - the constitutional requirement that the government must prove every element of every charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt before any American citizen can lose their liberty. Both principles are under sustained assault. Most defendants never know it until it is too late.This book delivers the most comprehensive guide available to the two most fundamental protections in American criminal law. Drawing on Supreme Court decisions from Morissette to Rehaif, on the National Registry of Exonerations, and on the real cases of real people prosecuted for conduct they had no idea was criminal, this book traces exactly how the mens rea requirement and the reasonable doubt standard have been systematically dismantled - and exactly what defendants, defense attorneys, and citizens can do about it.Inside: the complete history of the mens rea principle from Roman law through the Model Penal Code; the four mental states and what the prosecution must prove for each; how strict liability offenses have expanded to reach fishermen, guitar manufacturers, maintenance engineers, and healthcare providers who had no idea they were committing any crime; the Staples three-factor test for challenging strict liability prosecution; the Rehaif knowledge principle that has already changed hundreds of federal firearms cases; the constitutional dimensions of the reasonable doubt standard and how jury instructions, appellate deference, and the plea system have weakened it; and the complete practical guide - pre-trial motions, Rule 29 motions, jury instruction requests with specific language and authority, and appellate arguments - for asserting these protections at every stage of every criminal proceeding.The government must prove what you did. It must also prove what you intended. It must prove both beyond a reasonable doubt. This book hands every defendant, every defense attorney, and every citizen who believes the government must earn its convictions the complete legal arsenal to demand exactly that. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…