9789819201556 - controversies over accounting for goodwill (contributions to finance and accounting) (7 resultados)
- Tapa dura
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de AmericaBooks Puddle
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 80,03
Envío por EUR 3,43Se envía dentro de Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Condición: New.
Idioma: Inglés
Editorial: Springer, Berlin, Kyoto University Of Advanced Science, University Of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Springer, 2026
- Tapa dura
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AlemaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 53,49
Envío por EUR 30,50Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This is an Open Access book.The accounting treatment of goodwill has been widely debated, particularly regarding whether amortization should be reintroduced. After the IASB abolished amortization in IFRS 3 in 2004, the post-implementation review of IFRS 3… (PiR 3) was conducted from 2013 to 2015. The PiR 3 highlighted concerns that the impairment-only approach tends to cause the too little, too late issue, suggesting the reintroduction of amortization as one of the key primary candidates for a solution. During the process of the IASB responding to PiR 3, scandals such as the collapse of Carillion and massive goodwill write-downs by GE and Kraft Heinz reignited the debate. Critics argue that the impairment-only approach often results in too little, too late. Although the debate over whether goodwill should be amortized continued for the next 20 years without a resolution, the IASB halted the discussion in 2022; it now aims for a solution through disclosure, as users do not support the reintroduction of amortization.This study examines the key arguments in favor of and against goodwill amortization through an analysis of IASB and ASAF meetings, a review and analysis of prior theoretical research, a survey of prior empirical research, questionnaire- and interview-based surveys of stakeholder opinions, and original empirical research. It also explores accounting education as a potential factor influencing our findings. Through these analyses, this study highlights how differences in accounting education, jurisdictional norms, and stakeholder interests contribute to conflicting perspectives. The survey conducted in Japan reveals that preparers, users, and auditors overwhelmingly support the amortization-with-impairment approach, diverging from international trends. Empirical research using Japanese archival data shows evidence consistent with the notion that market participants often anticipate impairment losses before they are formally recognized, reinforcing concerns over the too little, too late issue. Moreover, goodwill accounting is not a simple dichotomy, as discussed by the accounting standards-setting body, but a complex structural issue. Furthermore, accounting education can influence stakeholder perspectives, especially those of auditors, in Japan. The study concludes that understanding these diverse viewpoints is essential for fostering meaningful dialogue on goodwill accounting reforms.
Idioma: Inglés
Editorial: Springer, Berlin, Kyoto University Of Advanced Science, University Of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Springer Sep 2026, 2026
- Tapa dura
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 53,49
Envío por EUR 23,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This is an Open Access book.The accounting treatment of goodwill has been widely debated, particularly regarding whether amortization should be reintroduced. After the IASB abolished amortization in IFRS 3 in 2004, the post-implementation…review of IFRS 3 (PiR 3) was conducted from 2013 to 2015. The PiR 3 highlighted concerns that the impairment-only approach tends to cause the too little, too late issue, suggesting the reintroduction of amortization as one of the key primary candidates for a solution. During the process of the IASB responding to PiR 3, scandals such as the collapse of Carillion and massive goodwill write-downs by GE and Kraft Heinz reignited the debate. Critics argue that the impairment-only approach often results in too little, too late. Although the debate over whether goodwill should be amortized continued for the next 20 years without a resolution, the IASB halted the discussion in 2022; it now aims for a solution through disclosure, as users do not support the reintroduction of amortization.This study examines the key arguments in favor of and against goodwill amortization through an analysis of IASB and ASAF meetings, a review and analysis of prior theoretical research, a survey of prior empirical research, questionnaire- and interview-based surveys of stakeholder opinions, and original empirical research. It also explores accounting education as a potential factor influencing our findings. Through these analyses, this study highlights how differences in accounting education, jurisdictional norms, and stakeholder interests contribute to conflicting perspectives. The survey conducted in Japan reveals that preparers, users, and auditors overwhelmingly support the amortization-with-impairment approach, diverging from international trends. Empirical research using Japanese archival data shows evidence consistent with the notion that market participants often anticipate impairment losses before they are formally recognized, reinforcing concerns over the too little, too late issue. Moreover, goodwill accounting is not a simple dichotomy, as discussed by the accounting standards-setting body, but a complex structural issue. Furthermore, accounting education can influence stakeholder perspectives, especially those of auditors, in Japan. The study concludes that understanding these diverse viewpoints is essential for fostering meaningful dialogue on goodwill accounting reforms. 474 pp. Englisch.
- Tapa dura
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino UnidoMajestic Books
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 78,66
Envío por EUR 7,58Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Condición: New. Print on Demand.
- Tapa dura
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: Biblios, frankfurt am main, HESSE, AlemaniaBiblios
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 80,80
Envío por EUR 9,95Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.
- Tapa dura
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemaniamoluna
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 48,37
Envío por EUR 48,99Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt.
- Tapa dura
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemaniapreigu
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 50,25
Envío por EUR 70,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 5 disponibles
Buch. Condición: Neu. Controversies Over Accounting for Goodwill | Yoshihiro Tokuga (u. a.) | Buch | Contributions to Finance and Accounting | xv | Englisch | 2026 | Springer | EAN 9789819201556 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]co…m | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.
