ISBN: 9786208263591 - analysis of the criminalisation of homotransphobia after the change promoted: backlash or unintentional silence? (9 resultados)

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Analysis of the Criminalisation of Homotransphobia After the Change Promoted | BACKLASH OR UNINTENTIONAL SILENCE? | João Matheus Amaro de Sousa | Taschenbuch | Einband - flex.(Paperback) | Englisch | 2024 | Our Knowledge Publishing | EAN 9786208263591 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: SIA OmniScriptum Publishing, Brivibas Gatve 197, 1039 RIGA, LETTLAND, customerservice[at]vdm-vsg[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.…

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -In Direct Action for Unconstitutionality by Omission (ADO) No. 26/DF, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) recognised the legislative delay in implementing the mandates to criminalise homotransphobia. On this occasion, the STF developed a concept of racism that includes prejudice and discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, sex, etc. In effect, the Court ruled that Law 7.716/1989 would apply until the advent of a specific normative act. However, this was amended by Law No. 14,532/2023 to separate racial slurs from prejudiced slurs in the criminal code, while reallocating racial slurs in the legislation to combat racism without making express reference to any of the elements of human sexuality. In this context, we seek to answer the central question: does the failure to include homotransphobia in the amendment made by Law 14.532/2023 to Law 7.716/1989 represent a backlash effect or is it an unintentional silence on the part of the legislator In the end, it is concluded that the absence of express mention in the legislative amendment does not consist of the aforementioned effect, but an acquiescence, albeit tacit, of the jurisprudential interpretation of the term racism. 76 pp. Englisch.…

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Condición: New. Print on Demand.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In Direct Action for Unconstitutionality by Omission (ADO) No. 26/DF, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) recognised the legislative delay in implementing the mandates to criminalise homotransphobia. On this occasion, the STF developed a concept of racism that includes prejudice and discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, sex, etc. In effect, the Court ruled that Law 7.716/1989 would apply until the advent of a specific normative act. However, this was amended by Law No. 14,532/2023 to separate racial slurs from prejudiced slurs in the criminal code, while reallocating racial slurs in the legislation to combat racism without making express reference to any of the elements of human sexuality. In this context, we seek to answer the central question: does the failure to include homotransphobia in the amendment made by Law 14.532/2023 to Law 7.716/1989 represent a backlash effect or is it an unintentional silence on the part of the legislator In the end, it is concluded that the absence of express mention in the legislative amendment does not consist of the aforementioned effect, but an acquiescence, albeit tacit, of the jurisprudential interpretation of the term racism.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -In Direct Action for Unconstitutionality by Omission (ADO) No. 26/DF, the Federal Supreme Court (STF) recognised the legislative delay in implementing the mandates to criminalise homotransphobia. On this occasion, the STF developed a concept of racism that includes prejudice and discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, sex, etc. In effect, the Court ruled that Law 7.716/1989 would apply until the advent of a specific normative act. However, this was amended by Law No. 14,532/2023 to separate racial slurs from prejudiced slurs in the criminal code, while reallocating racial slurs in the legislation to combat racism without making express reference to any of the elements of human sexuality. In this context, we seek to answer the central question: does the failure to include homotransphobia in the amendment made by Law 14.532/2023 to Law 7.716/1989 represent a backlash effect or is it an unintentional silence on the part of the legislator In the end, it is concluded that the absence of express mention in the legislative amendment does not consist of the aforementioned effect, but an acquiescence, albeit tacit, of the jurisprudential interpretation of the term racism.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 76 pp. Englisch.…