9786135830316 - best business practices for optimizing producer's and consumer's risks: innovating type-i and type-ii error probabilities with game-theory for realistic oc curves in acceptance sampling plans de sahinoglu, mehmet (5 resultados)
- Tapa blanda
Librería: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Reino UnidoRevaluation Books
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 64,78
Envío por EUR 11,77Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 68 pages. 8.66x5.91x0.16 inches. In Stock.
- Tapa blanda
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemaniapreigu
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 33,25
Envío por EUR 70,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 5 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Best Business Practices for Optimizing Producer's and Consumer's Risks | Innovating Type-I and Type-II Error Probabilities with Game-Theory for Realistic OC Curves in Acceptance Sampling Plans | Mehmet Sahinoglu | Taschenbuch | 68 S. | Englisch | 2018 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 978613583…0316 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 35,90
Envío por EUR 23,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -What should constitute suitably the cost-optimal values of alpha and beta in tests of hypotheses regarding the producer's and consumer's risks in a business setting This is not a question to answer unequivocally for all situations.…When establishing a test procedure to investigate statistically the credibility of a stated hypothesis, several factors must be considered one of which is the size of the sample. However, the most significant of all these factors is unquestionably to optimize Type I and II errors. Statisticians have by rule of thumb selected, such as =0.05, none for beta depending on the alternative hypothesis at hand. Although, common logic usually played a major role such as in the case of testing null hypothesis of the patient being sick needs a fairly significant size of type I error lest we lose the patient if we reject that she is sick while she truly is sick and probably dying. But all these previous up-to-date arguments are not somewhat connected with cost or utility of producer's and consumer's risks in the sense of quality control or life sciences or in the cyber-risk domain or other manufacturing industries while testing a hypothesis of a good product vs. bad. 68 pp. Englisch.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemaniabuchversandmimpf2000
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 35,90
Envío por EUR 60,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -What should constitute suitably the cost-optimal values of alpha and beta in tests of hypotheses regarding the producer's and consumer's risks in a business setting This is not a question to answer unequivocally for all situations. When… establishing a test procedure to investigate statistically the credibility of a stated hypothesis, several factors must be considered one of which is the size of the sample. However, the most significant of all these factors is unquestionably to optimize Type I and II errors. Statisticians have by rule of thumb selected, such as ¿=0.05, none for ß depending on the alternative hypothesis at hand. Although, common logic usually played a major role such as in the case of testing null hypothesis of the patient being sick needs a fairly significant size of type I error lest we lose the patient if we reject that she is sick while she truly is sick and probably dying. But all these previous up-to-date arguments are not somewhat connected with cost or utility of producer's and consumer's risks in the sense of quality control or life sciences or in the cyber-risk domain or other manufacturing industries while testing a hypothesis of a good product vs. bad.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 68 pp. Englisch.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AlemaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 37,20
Envío por EUR 60,60Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - What should constitute suitably the cost-optimal values of alpha and beta in tests of hypotheses regarding the producer's and consumer's risks in a business setting This is not a question to answer unequivocally for all situations. When…establishing a test procedure to investigate statistically the credibility of a stated hypothesis, several factors must be considered one of which is the size of the sample. However, the most significant of all these factors is unquestionably to optimize Type I and II errors. Statisticians have by rule of thumb selected, such as =0.05, none for beta depending on the alternative hypothesis at hand. Although, common logic usually played a major role such as in the case of testing null hypothesis of the patient being sick needs a fairly significant size of type I error lest we lose the patient if we reject that she is sick while she truly is sick and probably dying. But all these previous up-to-date arguments are not somewhat connected with cost or utility of producer's and consumer's risks in the sense of quality control or life sciences or in the cyber-risk domain or other manufacturing industries while testing a hypothesis of a good product vs. bad.
