9783330509733 - community evaluation of crowd-sourced ideas: an explorative study on how to improve the prediction accuracy of crowdsourcing communities de terlecki-zaniewicz, georg (8 resultados)
Idioma: Inglés
- Tapa blanda
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de AmericaBooks Puddle
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 69,78
Envío por EUR 3,50Se envía dentro de Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Condición: New.
- Tapa blanda
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemaniapreigu
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 44,05
Envío por EUR 70,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 5 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Community evaluation of crowd-sourced ideas | An explorative study on how to improve the prediction accuracy of crowdsourcing communities | Georg Terlecki-Zaniewicz | Taschenbuch | 92 S. | Englisch | 2017 | AV Akademikerverlag | EAN 9783330509733 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on De…mand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 49,90
Envío por EUR 23,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -In 2008, Google initiated an ideation challenge called 'Project 10 to the 100'. They asked quite openly 'What would help most ' and received more than 150,000 ideas from people all over the globe. As Google's 'Project 10 to the 100'… and many other real life examples show (e.g. Cisco's 'I-Prize' or Nokia's 'Tune Remake'), the number of submissions to crowdsourcing contests can be stunning. However, the majority of submitted ideas is usually of very low quality. According to the so-called Sturgeon's (1958) law, 90% of everything is crap. Firms are often overloaded by too much 'noise' generated on crowdsourcing platforms. They face the problem of not being able to filter and select the best ideas (or only being able to do so with substantial effort). Recently, scholars have proposed that the integration of crowdsourcing communities into the evaluation process appears to be a very promising method to filter high-quality ideas. In this explorative study, Georg Terlecki-Zaniewicz analyzed eleven crowdsourcing platforms, and concluded with a framework that makes the evaluation of crowd-sourced ideas through community evaluation both more efficient and more accurate. 92 pp. Englisch.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemaniamoluna
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 41,71
Envío por EUR 48,99Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Terlecki-Zaniewicz GeorgGeorg Terlecki-Zaniewicz studied at the Vienna University of Economics and Business. His main research focused on Crowdsourcing and other Open Innovation-related topics. Since 20…12, Georg Terlecki-Zaniewicz ha.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemaniabuchversandmimpf2000
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 49,90
Envío por EUR 60,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -In 2008, Google initiated an ideation challenge called 'Project 10 to the 100'. They asked quite openly 'What would help most ' and received more than 150,000 ideas from people all over the globe. As Google's 'Project 10 to the 100' and… many other real life examples show (e.g. Cisco's 'I-Prize' or Nokia's 'Tune Remake'), the number of submissions to crowdsourcing contests can be stunning. However, the majority of submitted ideas is usually of very low quality. According to the so-called Sturgeon's (1958) law, 90% of everything is crap. Firms are often overloaded by too much 'noise' generated on crowdsourcing platforms. They face the problem of not being able to filter and select the best ideas (or only being able to do so with substantial effort). Recently, scholars have proposed that the integration of crowdsourcing communities into the evaluation process appears to be a very promising method to filter high-quality ideas. In this explorative study, Georg Terlecki-Zaniewicz analyzed eleven crowdsourcing platforms, and concluded with a framework that makes the evaluation of crowd-sourced ideas through community evaluation both more efficient and more accurate.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 92 pp. Englisch.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AlemaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 49,90
Envío por EUR 60,78Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In 2008, Google initiated an ideation challenge called 'Project 10 to the 100'. They asked quite openly 'What would help most ' and received more than 150,000 ideas from people all over the globe. As Google's 'Project 10 to the 100' and…many other real life examples show (e.g. Cisco's 'I-Prize' or Nokia's 'Tune Remake'), the number of submissions to crowdsourcing contests can be stunning. However, the majority of submitted ideas is usually of very low quality. According to the so-called Sturgeon's (1958) law, 90% of everything is crap. Firms are often overloaded by too much 'noise' generated on crowdsourcing platforms. They face the problem of not being able to filter and select the best ideas (or only being able to do so with substantial effort). Recently, scholars have proposed that the integration of crowdsourcing communities into the evaluation process appears to be a very promising method to filter high-quality ideas. In this explorative study, Georg Terlecki-Zaniewicz analyzed eleven crowdsourcing platforms, and concluded with a framework that makes the evaluation of crowd-sourced ideas through community evaluation both more efficient and more accurate.
Idioma: Inglés
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino UnidoMajestic Books
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 69,30
Envío por EUR 7,63Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Condición: New. Print on Demand.
Idioma: Inglés
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: Biblios, frankfurt am main, HESSE, AlemaniaBiblios
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 68,97
Envío por EUR 9,95Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.
