Isbn: 9783110710069 - why china did not have a renaissance - and why that matters: an interdisciplinary dialogue: 1 (critical readings in global intellectual history, 1) (20 resultados)

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New. Concepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the "Renaissance." Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the "Renaissance" in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as "r/Renaissances," studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as "Renaissance" can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences.…

Condición: new.

Condición: New. pp. 255.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 255 pages. 9.05x6.10x0.67 inches. In Stock.

PF. Condición: New.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. pp. 255.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. 2020. Paperback. . . . . .

Condición: New. 2020. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Concepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the 'Renaissance.' Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the 'Renaissance' in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as 'r/Renaissances,' studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as 'Renaissance' can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Why China did not have a Renaissance - and why that matters | An interdisciplinary Dialogue | Barbara Mittler (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | ISSN | XVII | Englisch | 2020 | De Gruyter | EAN 9783110710069 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, De Gruyter GmbH, Genthiner Str. 13, 10785 Berlin, productsafety[at]degruyterbrill[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.…

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Concepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the 'Renaissance.' Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the 'Renaissance' in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as 'r/Renaissances,' studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as 'Renaissance' can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences. 260 pp. Englisch. …

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Thomas Maissen, Deutsches Historisches Institut, Paris, Universitaet Heidelbert Barbara Mittler, Universitaet Heidelberg.Concepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have exis.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Concepts of historical progress or decline and the idea of a cycle of historical movement have existed in many civilizations. In spite of claims that they be transnational or even universal, periodization schemes invariably reveal specific social and cultural predispositions.Our dialogue, which brings together a Sinologist and a scholar of early modern History in Europe, considers periodization as a historical phenomenon, studying the case of the ¿Renaissance.¿ Understood in the tradition of J. Burckhardt, who referred back to ideas voiced by the humanists of the 14th and 15th centuries, and focusing on the particularities of humanist dialogue which informed the making of the ¿Renaissance¿ in Italy, our discussion highlights elements that distinguish it from other movements that have proclaimed themselves as ¿r/Renaissances,¿ studying, in particular, the Chinese Renaissance in the early 20th century.While disagreeing on several fundamental issues, we suggest that interdisciplinary and interregional dialogue is a format useful to addressing some of the more far-reaching questions in global history, e.g. whether and when a periodization scheme such as ¿Renaissance¿ can fruitfully be applied to describe non-European experiences.Oldenbourg Wissensch.Vlg, Genthiner Straße 13, 10785 Berlin 260 pp. Englisch.…