ISBN: 9780804724364 - the disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power (writing science) (23 resultados)

Condición: very_good. Book is in very good condition and may include minimal underlining highlighting. The book can also include "From the library of" labels. May not contain miscellaneous items toys, dvds, etc. . We offer 100% money back guarantee and 24 7 customer service.

Hardcover. Condición: Fine. 1st Edition. Hardcover, with dust jacket. 568 pgs. Fine in near fine dj.

1st edn. 8vo. Original silver lettered black cloth (boards lightly bowed - otherwise VG), dustwrapper (VG in protective cover). Pp. xiv + 567 (no inscriptions).

Condición: Good. Used Item. Does not include New Access Codes , Cd's or one time use items that come when New. This item is Used.

Condición: new.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Hardback. Condición: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.…

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. pp. 584.

Hardback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New. Sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation. Editor(s): Galison, Peter; Stump, David J. Series: Writing Science. Num Pages: 584 pages, 16 half-tones, notes, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: PDA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 236 x 158 x 39. Weight in Grams: 966. . 1996. 1st Edition. Hardcover. . . . . …

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. pp. 584.

Hardback. Condición: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.…

Gebunden. Condición: New. Sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation.&Uumlber den AutorrnrnPeter Galison is Mallinckrodt Professor of the History of Scien.

Condición: New. Sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation. Editor(s): Galison, Peter; Stump, David J. Series: Writing Science. Num Pages: 584 pages, 16 half-tones, notes, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: PDA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 236 x 158 x 39. Weight in Grams: 966. . 1996. 1st Edition. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. …

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 1st edition. 584 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Is science unified or disunified Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner. 584 pp. Englisch.…

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 1st edition. 584 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.50 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Buch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Is science unified or disunified Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.…