Isbn: 9780674024601 - statutory default rules: how to interpret unclear legislation (12 resultados)

Hardcover. Condición: As New. Estado de la sobrecubierta: As New. 1st Edition. Book is in pristine condition with no marks or signs of wear. Could be sold as a brand new book.

hardcover. Condición: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority.

Condición: New.

hardcover. Condición: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 344 pages. 9.50x6.25x1.25 inches. In Stock.

Gebunden. Condición: New. Most new law is statutory law that is, law enacted by legislators. An important question, therefore, is how should this law be interpreted by courts and agencies, especially when the text of a statute is not entirely clear. This book focuses on what judges.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Most new law is statutory law; that is, law enacted by legislators. An important question, therefore, is how should this law be interpreted by courts and agencies, especially when the text of a statute is not entirely clear. There is a great deal of scholarly literature on the rules and legal materials courts should use in interpreting statutes. This book takes a fresh approach by focusing instead on what judges should do once the legal materials fail to resolve the interpretive question. It challenges the common assumption that in such cases judges should exercise interstitial lawmaking power. Instead, it argues that--wherever one believes the interpretive inquiry has failed to resolve the statutory meaning--judges can and should use statutory default rules that are designed to maximize the satisfaction of enactable political preferences; that is, the political preferences of the polity that are shared among enough elected officials that they could and would be enacted into law if the issue were on the legislative agenda.These default rules explain many recent high-profile cases, including the Guantánamo detainees case, the sentencing guidelines case, the decision denying the FDA authority to regulate cigarettes, and the case that refused to allow the attorney general to criminalize drugs used in physician-assisted suicide.…

Condición: New. pp. vi + 386.

Condición: New. pp. vi + 386 Illus.