ISBN: 9780252068676 - citizen critics: literary public spheres (history of communication) (26 resultados)

paperback. Condición: Very Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used books may not include companion materials, and may have some shelf wear or limited writing. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority.

paperback. Condición: Good. Good - Bumped and creased book with tears to the extremities, but not affecting the text block, may have remainder mark or previous owner's name - GOOD PAPERBACK Standard-sized.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New. The condition of our public discussions about literary and cultural works has much to say about the state of our democracy. Classrooms, newspapers, magazines, Internet forums, and many other places grant citizens a place to hold public discourses-and claim a voice on national artistic matters. Rosa A. Eberly looks at four censorship controversies where professionals asserted their authority to deny citizen critics a voice-and effectively removed discussion of literature from the public sphere. Eberly compares the outrage sparked by the publication of James Joyce's Ulysses and Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer with the relative quiescence that greeted the much more violent and sexually explicit content of Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho and Andrea Dworkin's Mercy. Through a close reading of letters to the editor, reviews, media coverage, and court cases, Eberly shows how literary critics and legal experts defused censorship debates-and undercut the authority of citizen critics-by shifting the focus from content to aesthetics and from social values to publicity.…

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condición: new.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. The condition of our public discussions about literary and cultural works has much to say about the state of our democracy. Classrooms, newspapers, magazines, Internet forums, and many other places grant citizens a place to hold public discourses-and claim a voice on national artistic matters. Rosa A. Eberly looks at four censorship controversies where professionals asserted their authority to deny citizen critics a voice-and effectively removed discussion of literature from the public sphere. Eberly compares the outrage sparked by the publication of James Joyce's Ulysses and Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer with the relative quiescence that greeted the much more violent and sexually explicit content of Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho and Andrea Dworkin's Mercy. Through a close reading of letters to the editor, reviews, media coverage, and court cases, Eberly shows how literary critics and legal experts defused censorship debates-and undercut the authority of citizen critics-by shifting the focus from content to aesthetics and from social values to publicity. A study of the links among literature, rhetoric, and democracy that explores the public debate generated by amateur and professional readers about four controversial literary works: two that were censored in the United States and two that created conflict because they were not censored. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Condición: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,450grams, ISBN:9780252068676.

Condición: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,450grams, ISBN:9780252068676.

Condición: New. A study of the links among literature, rhetoric, and democracy that explores the public debate generated by amateur and professional readers about four controversial literary works: two that were censored in the United States and two that created conflict because they were not censored. Num Pages: 224 pages. BIC Classification: DS; JFC; JHM. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 227 x 151 x 16. Weight in Grams: 345. . 2000. Paperback. . . . .…

Paperback. Condición: Very Good. No Jacket. First Edition. First edition, 2000. The History of Communication series, edited by Robert W. McChesney and John C. Nerone. Examines public responses to controversial literature, including Ulysses, Tropic of Cancer, American Psycho and Mercy, and the participation of readers in censorship debates. Paperback in printed wrappers. Light surface rubbing and handling marks; small creases and wear at cover corners and edges. Page edges lightly toned; contents clean and unmarked.…

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 199 pages. 9.00x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New. pp. 224.

Condición: New. A study of the links among literature, rhetoric, and democracy that explores the public debate generated by amateur and professional readers about four controversial literary works: two that were censored in the United States and two that created conflict because they were not censored. Num Pages: 224 pages. BIC Classification: DS; JFC; JHM. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 227 x 151 x 16. Weight in Grams: 345. . 2000. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.…

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. pp. 224.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. A study of the links among literature, rhetoric, and democracy that explores the public debate generated by amateur and professional readers about four controversial literary works: two that were censored in the United States and two that created conflict b.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. The condition of our public discussions about literary and cultural works has much to say about the state of our democracy. Classrooms, newspapers, magazines, Internet forums, and many other places grant citizens a place to hold public discourses-and claim a voice on national artistic matters. Rosa A. Eberly looks at four censorship controversies where professionals asserted their authority to deny citizen critics a voice-and effectively removed discussion of literature from the public sphere. Eberly compares the outrage sparked by the publication of James Joyce's Ulysses and Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer with the relative quiescence that greeted the much more violent and sexually explicit content of Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho and Andrea Dworkin's Mercy. Through a close reading of letters to the editor, reviews, media coverage, and court cases, Eberly shows how literary critics and legal experts defused censorship debates-and undercut the authority of citizen critics-by shifting the focus from content to aesthetics and from social values to publicity. A study of the links among literature, rhetoric, and democracy that explores the public debate generated by amateur and professional readers about four controversial literary works: two that were censored in the United States and two that created conflict because they were not censored. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Condición: New. The condition of our public discussions about literary and cultural works has much to say about the state of our democracy. Classrooms, newspapers, magazines, Internet forums, and many other places grant citizens a place to hold public discourses-and claim a voice on national artistic matters. Rosa A. Eberly looks at four censorship controversies where professionals asserted their authority to deny citizen critics a voice-and effectively removed discussion of literature from the public sphere. Eberly compares the outrage sparked by the publication of James Joyce's Ulysses and Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer with the relative quiescence that greeted the much more violent and sexually explicit content of Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho and Andrea Dworkin's Mercy. Through a close reading of letters to the editor, reviews, media coverage, and court cases, Eberly shows how literary critics and legal experts defused censorship debates-and undercut the authority of citizen critics-by shifting the focus from content to aesthetics and from social values to publicity.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The condition of our public discussions about literary and cultural works has much to say about the state of our democracy. Classrooms, newspapers, magazines, Internet forums, and many other places grant citizens a place to hold public discourses-and claim a voice on national artistic matters. Rosa A. Eberly looks at four censorship controversies where professionals asserted their authority to deny citizen critics a voice-and effectively removed discussion of literature from the public sphere. Eberly compares the outrage sparked by the publication of James Joyce's Ulysses and Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer with the relative quiescence that greeted the much more violent and sexually explicit content of Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho and Andrea Dworkin's Mercy. Through a close reading of letters to the editor, reviews, media coverage, and court cases, Eberly shows how literary critics and legal experts defused censorship debates-and undercut the authority of citizen critics-by shifting the focus from content to aesthetics and from social values to publicity. 224 pp. Englisch.…

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - The condition of our public discussions about literary and cultural works has much to say about the state of our democracy. Classrooms, newspapers, magazines, Internet forums, and many other places grant citizens a place to hold public discourses-and claim a voice on national artistic matters. Rosa A. Eberly looks at four censorship controversies where professionals asserted their authority to deny citizen critics a voice-and effectively removed discussion of literature from the public sphere. Eberly compares the outrage sparked by the publication of James Joyce's Ulysses and Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer with the relative quiescence that greeted the much more violent and sexually explicit content of Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho and Andrea Dworkin's Mercy. Through a close reading of letters to the editor, reviews, media coverage, and court cases, Eberly shows how literary critics and legal experts defused censorship debates-and undercut the authority of citizen critics-by shifting the focus from content to aesthetics and from social values to publicity.…