Musschenga aw (56 resultados)

Condición: Good. Former library copy. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

paperback. Condición: New. 1st.

Condición: Fair. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In fair condition, suitable as a study copy. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,450grams, ISBN:9039004048. …

Paperback. Condición: Very Good. No Jacket. Former library book; May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback, nette staat, 101 pagina's.

Condición: Good.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. In the dominant view, morality is more rational and universal than, and therefore independent from, (christian) religion. Believers do not have exclusive moral knowledge. Moral principles can be known by anyone. Morality, not religion, is the supreme judge of human actions in the world. Some contributors to this volume defend this view on theological and philosophical grounds. The advantages of such a view for thinking about a common global morality are clear. However, according to many authors, the conception of morality underlying this view is at the least, impoverished, if not wrong: this view cannot explain the importance and the persistence of moral taboos. Furthermore, every morality is influenced by metaphysical and anthropological assumptions - whether or not religious: the so-called modern, rational, secular morality. The central moral question in the alternative narrative concept of morality is 'Who am I / who do I want to be ?' and not 'What is the right action ?' In this approach, not universal principles, but tradition-dependant stories constitute the core of a morality. Are these concepts more adequate for understanding the relation of religion to morality ? Do they have room for the project of a universal morality of human rights ? Papers from a symposium on belief, worldview, and morality, organized by the Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Science, Society, and Religion ('Bezinningscentrum') of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback, 215 pagina's.

Paperback, 272 pagina's.

Paperback, 268 pagina's.

Paperback. Condición: New. In the dominant view, morality is more rational and universal than, and therefore independent from, (christian) religion. Believers do not have exclusive moral knowledge. Moral principles can be known by anyone. Morality, not religion, is the supreme judge of human actions in the world. Some contributors to this volume defend this view on theological and philosophical grounds. The advantages of such a view for thinking about a common global morality are clear. However, according to many authors, the conception of morality underlying this view is at the least, impoverished, if not wrong: this view cannot explain the importance and the persistence of moral taboos. Furthermore, every morality is influenced by metaphysical and anthropological assumptions - whether or not religious: the so-called modern, rational, secular morality. The central moral question in the alternative narrative concept of morality is 'Who am I / who do I want to be ?' and not 'What is the right action ?' In this approach, not universal principles, but tradition-dependant stories constitute the core of a morality. Are these concepts more adequate for understanding the relation of religion to morality ? Do they have room for the project of a universal morality of human rights .…

1e dr. - Gebrocheerd.

Paperback, 24 cm, 347 pp. Cond.: goed / good. ISBN: 9789024266241.

270 p. Paperback.

24 cm. original paperback. 216 pp. references. index. -good. 395g.

Condición: New. 1995. Paperback. . . . . .

Paperback. Condición: Good. In goede staat, paperback, Studies over levensbeschouwing, wetenschap en samenleving, 347 pp., 24x16x2 cm Verkleurde rug omslag, Selectie van gebruikte literatuur, personalia auteurs, wordt verzonden als brievenbuspakket.

paperback. Condición: New. Special order direct from the distributor.

Amst., VU, 1996. 215 blz. Paperback. Goed. #9053835156. [130041].

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 212 pages. 9.50x6.25x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. 1995. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Softcover, in-8?°, 268pp. Een begripanalytisch en een antropologisch onderzoek. 777 g.

Assen, Van Gorcum, 1980. (XII) 268 pp. Paperback (PP, 1) *stempeltje op schutblad, goede staat*.

Condición: New.

Assen, Van Gorcum, 1992. (VIII) 338 pp. Paperback. *small stamp on titlepage, good condition* Contributors S. Griffioen, K. Raes, J. Jelsma a.o.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. In the dominant view, morality is more rational and universal than, and therefore independent from, (christian) religion. Believers do not have exclusive moral knowledge. Moral principles can be known by anyone. Morality, not religion, is the supreme judge of human actions in the world. Some contributors to this volume defend this view on theological and philosophical grounds. The advantages of such a view for thinking about a common global morality are clear. However, according to many authors, the conception of morality underlying this view is at the least, impoverished, if not wrong: this view cannot explain the importance and the persistence of moral taboos. Furthermore, every morality is influenced by metaphysical and anthropological assumptions - whether or not religious: the so-called modern, rational, secular morality. The central moral question in the alternative narrative concept of morality is 'Who am I / who do I want to be ?' and not 'What is the right action ?' In this approach, not universal principles, but tradition-dependant stories constitute the core of a morality. Are these concepts more adequate for understanding the relation of religion to morality ? Do they have room for the project of a universal morality of human rights ? Papers from a symposium on belief, worldview, and morality, organized by the Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Science, Society, and Religion ('Bezinningscentrum') of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Condición: New. In the dominant view, morality is more rational and universal than, and therefore independent from, (christian) religion. Believers do not have exclusive moral knowledge. Moral principles can be known by anyone. Morality, not religion, is the supreme judge of human actions in the world. Some contributors to this volume defend this view on theological and philosophical grounds. The advantages of such a view for thinking about a common global morality are clear. However, according to many authors, the conception of morality underlying this view is at the least, impoverished, if not wrong: this view cannot explain the importance and the persistence of moral taboos. Furthermore, every morality is influenced by metaphysical and anthropological assumptions - whether or not religious: the so-called modern, rational, secular morality. The central moral question in the alternative narrative concept of morality is 'Who am I / who do I want to be ?' and not 'What is the right action ?' In this approach, not universal principles, but tradition-dependant stories constitute the core of a morality. Are these concepts more adequate for understanding the relation of religion to morality ? Do they have room for the project of a universal morality of human rights .…

Soft cover. Condición: Good. (viii), 338 pp. Original paperback.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.