matej cibik (7 resultados)

Softcover. Condición: Fair. Spuren von Feuchtigkeit / Nasse; Leichte Kratzer / Abnutzungen / Druckstellen. Kniha Liberali a ti druhi predstavuje liberalizmus ako sposob nazerania na spolocnost a zaroven hlboku tradiciu politickeho myslenia. Vychadza prevazne zo sucasnych politickych diskusii na Slovensku a v strednej Europe, ktore sa snazi pristupnym sposobom filozoficky uchopit. Okrem vysvetlenia zdrojov liberalneho politickeho myslenia, jeho historie a sucasnosti sa preto venuje zasadnym spornym temam vo verejnom priestore: statnemu prerozdelovaniu bohatstva, feminizmu, pravam homosexualov ci utecencom. Citatel si z nej odnesie porozumenie hodnotovych zakladov sucasnej spolocnosti, ako ich vnimaju nielen liberali, ale aj ich oponenti.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Autonomy, Liberty and Neutrality in Liberal State | How a theory of state neutrality can overcome perfectionist objections | Matej Cibik | Taschenbuch | 56 S. | Englisch | 2012 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9783848412341 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Paperback. Condición: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This book analyzes the neutrality of the liberal state. This area of enquiry poses a genuine and very important question for political theory: how should the state be constrained in relation to autonomous individuals and their various and conflicting conceptions of good and right. The presumption is that citizens are due certain non- preferential neutral treatment with the state not adopting nor enforcing any controversial values. Nevertheless, a justification and specification of this presumption is hard to find. I argue that even though this problem is genuine, its sollution is necessarily derivative. The answer to the question when does the state need to be neutral, how and why presupposes a theory of rights and liberties. Only once the issue of protected personal space, beliefs and actions is resolved will it be possible to identify those particular areas of life into which the state is morally bound not to interfere (or, in some other cases, is bound to interfere) because of neutrality considerations. 56 pp. Englisch.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Cibik MatejMatej Cibik is an advanced graduate student in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Charles University in Prague, holding an M.A. in philosophy from Central European University. He specializes in political p.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This book analyzes the neutrality of the liberal state. This area of enquiry poses a genuine and very important question for political theory: how should the state be constrained in relation to autonomous individuals and their various and conflicting conceptions of good and right. The presumption is that citizens are due certain non- preferential neutral treatment with the state not adopting nor enforcing any controversial values. Nevertheless, a justification and specification of this presumption is hard to find. I argue that even though this problem is genuine, its sollution is necessarily derivative. The answer to the question 'when does the state need to be neutral, how and why' presupposes a theory of rights and liberties. Only once the issue of protected personal space, beliefs and actions is resolved will it be possible to identify those particular areas of life into which the state is morally bound not to interfere (or, in some other cases, is bound to interfere) because of neutrality considerations.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 56 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book analyzes the neutrality of the liberal state. This area of enquiry poses a genuine and very important question for political theory: how should the state be constrained in relation to autonomous individuals and their various and conflicting conceptions of good and right. The presumption is that citizens are due certain non- preferential neutral treatment with the state not adopting nor enforcing any controversial values. Nevertheless, a justification and specification of this presumption is hard to find. I argue that even though this problem is genuine, its sollution is necessarily derivative. The answer to the question when does the state need to be neutral, how and why presupposes a theory of rights and liberties. Only once the issue of protected personal space, beliefs and actions is resolved will it be possible to identify those particular areas of life into which the state is morally bound not to interfere (or, in some other cases, is bound to interfere) because of neutrality considerations.