Marius kohmann (5 resultados)
- Tapa blanda
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de AmericaCalifornia Books
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 4 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 26,66
Gastos de envío gratisSe envía dentro de Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Condición: New.
- Tapa blanda
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AlemaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 18,95
Envío por EUR 60,28Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Miscellaneous, grade: 1,3, Technical University of Munich, language: English, abstract: In today's business world, you must be tough, smart and witty in order to succeed and to sa…tisfy your superior. Oftentimes you go into a negotiation only knowing the target price you have to achieve and not looking for a valuable compromise. Chasing only after the biggest possible share of this fixed-pie and assuming the negotiator on the other side of the table does so too, hinders you from being a successful negotiator.Furthermore, in sales negotiations you often try to achieve the highest selling price possible and if the other party cannot agree on a price close to that point, you sell the object for the minimum price that was given to you, so you will still satisfy your superior. If you cannot not manage to sell for the minimum price, you decline the offer, stop the negotiations and chose your 'best alternative to negotiated agreement' (BATNA). Unfortunately, many people go into negotiations not even knowing their own BATNA. In this case, a negotiator might sell the object for a lower price than the one that could have achieved without this negotiation. Good negotiators do not only know their own BATNA, they also have an approximate idea about the BATNA of the opposing party, so they can develop their strategy based on that knowledge and will more likely succeed in the negotiation.The outcomes of negotiations do not only depend on the alternatives of each party or the asymmetric distribution of information, but also on the communication method the parties use. Depending on the position of each party it is more efficient to use a traditional face-to-face communication method or to make use of digital support, like video-mediated communication methods (VMC, i.e. Skype, facetime, etc.).We would like to improve (integrative) negotiation outcomes by addressing the following question: does the use of VMC lead to more pareto-efficient results in fixed-pie situations As technology becomes more and more advanced and business is mostly conducted within global environments, the way and method of communication becomes more relevant in the everyday economy.Our paper tries to answer this question in the following way: first, we introduce the theory of with current aspects of digitalization. From the established theory, we derive three hypotheses and present our research design. After a brief discussion of the potentials and limitations of our experiment, we close with a short summary and an outlook to potential follow-up research.
- Tapa blanda
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemaniapreigu
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 18,95
Envío por EUR 70,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 5 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. The Effect of video-mediated communication on negotiations in fixed-pie situations. A comparison of pareto-efficiency with face-to- face communication | Marius Kohmann | Taschenbuch | Aus der Reihe: [.] stipendiaten-wissen | 28 S. | Englisch | 2019 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783668866591 | Verantwortliche…Person für die EU: GRIN Publishing GmbH, Waltherstr. 23, 80337 München, info[at]grin[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, , AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 18,95
Envío por EUR 23,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Miscellaneous, grade: 1,3, Technical University of Munich, language: English, abstract: In today's business world, you must be tough, smart and witty in order to s…ucceed and to satisfy your superior. Oftentimes you go into a negotiation only knowing the target price you have to achieve and not looking for a valuable compromise. Chasing only after the biggest possible share of this fixed-pie and assuming the negotiator on the other side of the table does so too, hinders you from being a successful negotiator.Furthermore, in sales negotiations you often try to achieve the highest selling price possible and if the other party cannot agree on a price close to that point, you sell the object for the minimum price that was given to you, so you will still satisfy your superior. If you cannot not manage to sell for the minimum price, you decline the offer, stop the negotiations and chose your 'best alternative to negotiated agreement' (BATNA). Unfortunately, many people go into negotiations not even knowing their own BATNA. In this case, a negotiator might sell the object for a lower price than the one that could have achieved without this negotiation. Good negotiators do not only know their own BATNA, they also have an approximate idea about the BATNA of the opposing party, so they can develop their strategy based on that knowledge and will more likely succeed in the negotiation.The outcomes of negotiations do not only depend on the alternatives of each party or the asymmetric distribution of information, but also on the communication method the parties use. Depending on the position of each party it is more efficient to use a traditional face-to-face communication method or to make use of digital support, like video-mediated communication methods (VMC, i.e. Skype, facetime, etc.).We would like to improve (integrative) negotiation outcomes by addressing the following question: does the use of VMC lead to more pareto-efficient results in fixed-pie situations As technology becomes more and more advanced and business is mostly conducted within global environments, the way and method of communication becomes more relevant in the everyday economy.Our paper tries to answer this question in the following way: first, we introduce the theory of with current aspects of digitalization. From the established theory, we derive three hypotheses and present our research design. After a brief discussion of the potentials and limitations of our experiment, we close with a short summary and an outlook to potential follow-up research. 28 pp. Englisch.
- Tapa blanda
- Impresión bajo demanda
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemaniabuchversandmimpf2000
Contactar con el vendedorVendedor de 5 estrellasCondición: Nuevo
EUR 18,95
Envío por EUR 60,00Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de AmericaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Miscellaneous, grade: 1,3, Technical University of Munich, language: English, abstract: In today¿s business world, you must be tough, smart and witty in order to succe…ed and to satisfy your superior. Oftentimes you go into a negotiation only knowing the target price you have to achieve and not looking for a valuable compromise. Chasing only after the biggest possible share of this fixed-pie and assuming the negotiator on the other side of the table does so too, hinders you from being a successful negotiator.Furthermore, in sales negotiations you often try to achieve the highest selling price possible and if the other party cannot agree on a price close to that point, you sell the object for the minimum price that was given to you, so you will still satisfy your superior. If you cannot not manage to sell for the minimum price, you decline the offer, stop the negotiations and chose your ¿best alternative to negotiated agreement¿ (BATNA). Unfortunately, many people go into negotiations not even knowing their own BATNA. In this case, a negotiator might sell the object for a lower price than the one that could have achieved without this negotiation. Good negotiators do not only know their own BATNA, they also have an approximate idea about the BATNA of the opposing party, so they can develop their strategy based on that knowledge and will more likely succeed in the negotiation.The outcomes of negotiations do not only depend on the alternatives of each party or the asymmetric distribution of information, but also on the communication method the parties use. Depending on the position of each party it is more efficient to use a traditional face-to-face communication method or to make use of digital support, like video-mediated communication methods (VMC, i.e. Skype, facetime, etc.).We would like to improve (integrative) negotiation outcomes by addressing the following question: does the use of VMC lead to more pareto-efficient results in fixed-pie situations As technology becomes more and more advanced and business is mostly conducted within global environments, the way and method of communication becomes more relevant in the everyday economy.Our paper tries to answer this question in the following way: first, we introduce the theory of with current aspects of digitalization. From the established theory, we derive three hypotheses and present our research design. After a brief discussion of the potentials and limitations of our experiment, we close with a short summary and an outlook to potential follow-up research.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 28 pp. Englisch.
