F r amrine (56 resultados)

Hardcover. Condición: Very Good. No Jacket. Former library book; May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 4-5 days from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Condición: NF. Hardback in Near Fine condition with Near Fine dust jacket. Boston Studies In The Philosophy And History Of Science, 115. 9.3 X 6.2 X 0.7 inches. 227 pages. * Quick Shipping * All Books Mailed in Boxes * Free Tracking Provided *.

Paperback. Condición: New. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 4-5 days from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely.

Paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

hardcover. Condición: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Hardcover. Condición: Near Fine. Near Fine. 8vo 8" - 9" tall; 227 pp; Boston Studies In The Philosophy And History Of Science, 115.

Paperback. Condición: Very Good. 22.5 x 15 cm. Octavo. 442pp. Bibliography, index, ads. Some toning to the covers. Top of back cover bumped. Light toning to paper. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume 97. Sections are: Part I: Goethe in the History of Science, part II: Expanding the Limits of Traditional Scientific Methodology and Ontology, part III: Contemporary Relevance: A Viable Alternative.…

Condición: Hervorragend. Zustand: Hervorragend | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | On the 25th anniversary of the founding of the Boston Studies series in 1985, Cohen, Elkana, and Wartofsky wrote in another preface such as this that the time had come for establishing institutions supporting a vision to which the series had been devoted since its inception, namely that of a more broadly conceived, interdisciplinary study of the history and philosophy of science: In recent years it has become evident that, in addition to serious and competent disciplinary work on the specifics of the History of Science, the Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Science, there is now a growing need to develop a problem­ oriented approach which no longer distinguishes between these three specialties in a cut and dried way. Since the time has come for such an approach, the institutional tools should be provided. A way to do so would be . . . to organize colloquia and to publish good papers stemming from these, without attempting to organize the papers under the separate rubrics of History of Philosophy or Sociology of Science; and moreover to consider it natural that any fundamental issue of the foundations of the sciences, or their place in a culture and the way they are institutionalized in the societal web, is still our concern, no matter whether we are a professional scientist, historian or philosopher who deals with the problem (p. vii).…

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condición: Good+. 1st. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science vol. 97. A 1st ed. good+ paperback, minor signs of wear on cov. as in image, text/block tight clean (image_2). 442p. 22,5x15cm. 800gr. Notice: Has increased shipping cost due to size & weight (0,8kg.). Look up "Shipping terms".…

Condición: New. In English.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - On the 25th anniversary of the founding of the Boston Studies series in 1985, Cohen, Elkana, and Wartofsky wrote in another preface such as this that the time had come for establishing institutions supporting a vision to which the series had been devoted since its inception, namely that of a more broadly conceived, interdisciplinary study of the history and philosophy of science: In recent years it has become evident that, in addition to serious and competent disciplinary work on the specifics of the History of Science, the Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Science, there is now a growing need to develop a problem oriented approach which no longer distinguishes between these three specialties in a cut and dried way. Since the time has come for such an approach, the institutional tools should be provided. A way to do so would be . . . to organize colloquia and to publish good papers stemming from these, without attempting to organize the papers under the separate rubrics of History of Philosophy or Sociology of Science; and moreover to consider it natural that any fundamental issue of the foundations of the sciences, or their place in a culture and the way they are institutionalized in the societal web, is still our concern, no matter whether we are a professional scientist, historian or philosopher who deals with the problem (p. vii).…