9786203462067 - A hybrid risk management and value management model: A hybrid risk management and value management modelbased on MCDM in contractor selection de Aghajanzadeh Hooshy... (5 resultados)

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. A hybrid risk management and value management model | A hybrid risk management and value management modelbased on MCDM in contractor selection | Mehrnaz Aghajanzadeh Hooshyar | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2021 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9786203462067 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -In this research, an hybrid approach based on risk management and value engineering has been developed to select contractors in construction projects. This model is designed based on some criteria and sub-criteria derived from the literature whose importance is evaluated by the best worst method. The contractors were then prioritized using VIKOR methods and GrayRelationship Analysis. According to the computational results, it can be observed that the local risk strategic (0.348) has the highest score among the criteria and the other risk weighted local scale (0.080) has the lowest score among the criteria. In terms of operational risk, the technical error sub-criterion had the highest local weight (0.477) and the cheaper sub-criterion the lowestlocal weight (0.165). In the strategic risk dimension, the social dissatisfaction sub-criterion reported the highest local weight (0.380) and the environmental dissatisfaction sub-criterion the lowest local weight (0.136). 116 pp. Englisch.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Aghajanzadeh Hooshyar MehrnazMaster of Civil Engineering in Construction Management and Engineering.In this research, an hybrid approach based on risk management and value engineering has been developed to select contractors in c.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -In this research, an hybrid approach based on risk management and value engineering has been developed to select contractors in construction projects. This model is designed based on some criteria and sub-criteria derived from the literature whose importance is evaluated by the best worst method. The contractors were then prioritized using VIKOR methods and GrayRelationship Analysis. According to the computational results, it can be observed that the local risk strategic (0.348) has the highest score among the criteria and the other risk weighted local scale (0.080) has the lowest score among the criteria. In terms of operational risk, the technical error sub-criterion had the highest local weight (0.477) and the cheaper sub-criterion the lowestlocal weight (0.165). In the strategic risk dimension, the social dissatisfaction sub-criterion reported the highest local weight (0.380) and the environmental dissatisfaction sub-criterion the lowest local weight (0.136).VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 116 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this research, an hybrid approach based on risk management and value engineering has been developed to select contractors in construction projects. This model is designed based on some criteria and sub-criteria derived from the literature whose importance is evaluated by the best worst method. The contractors were then prioritized using VIKOR methods and GrayRelationship Analysis. According to the computational results, it can be observed that the local risk strategic (0.348) has the highest score among the criteria and the other risk weighted local scale (0.080) has the lowest score among the criteria. In terms of operational risk, the technical error sub-criterion had the highest local weight (0.477) and the cheaper sub-criterion the lowestlocal weight (0.165). In the strategic risk dimension, the social dissatisfaction sub-criterion reported the highest local weight (0.380) and the environmental dissatisfaction sub-criterion the lowest local weight (0.136).