Isbn: 9783838313771 - experimental study of ahp and cv requirements prioritization techniques: a experiment to compare two requirements prioritization techniques: ahp and ... time, scalability, accuracy and ease of use (5 resultados)

ISBN
Refinar con la Búsqueda avanzada

Filtrar la búsqueda

  • Libros (5)

a

Intervalo de precios personalizado (EUR)

a

    • Idioma: Inglés

      Editorial: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Tapa blanda

      Librería: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Reino UnidoMispah books

      Vendedor de 4 estrellas
      Contactar con el vendedor

      Condición: Usado - Como Nuevo

      EUR 121,47

      Envío por EUR 29,19 
      Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America

      Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles

      Paperback. Condición: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

    • Idioma: Inglés

      Editorial: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Sep 2009, 2009

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Tapa blanda
      • Impresión bajo demanda

      Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

      Vendedor de 5 estrellas
      Contactar con el vendedor

      Condición: Nuevo

      EUR 49,00

      Envío por EUR 23,00 
      Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

      Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles

      Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test. 80 pp. Englisch.

    • Idioma: Inglés

      Editorial: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2009

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Tapa blanda
      • Impresión bajo demanda

      Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemaniamoluna

      Vendedor de 5 estrellas
      Contactar con el vendedor

      Condición: Nuevo

      EUR 41,05

      Envío por EUR 48,99 
      Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

      Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles

      Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can p.

    • Idioma: Inglés

      Editorial: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Tapa blanda
      • Impresión bajo demanda

      Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AlemaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH

      Vendedor de 5 estrellas
      Contactar con el vendedor

      Condición: Nuevo

      EUR 70,99

      Envío por EUR 30,50 
      Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

      Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles

      Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test.

    • Idioma: Inglés

      Editorial: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Sep 2009, 2009

      3838313771 / 9783838313771

      • Tapa blanda
      • Impresión bajo demanda

      Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemaniabuchversandmimpf2000

      Vendedor de 5 estrellas
      Contactar con el vendedor

      Condición: Nuevo

      EUR 49,00

      Envío por EUR 60,00 
      Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

      Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles

      Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Prioritizing software requirements helps to determine which requirements are most important, and the order in which requirements should be developed and tested throughout the development life cycle. By prioritizing the requirements, software engineers can put focus on a subset of all requirements, and implement these in a particular release. This work aims to analyze two ratio scale prioritization techniques named Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Cumulative Voting (CV) by a controlled experiment, conducted on software engineering/computer science master students. The experiment was designed to compare time consumption, scalability and accuracy between the two techniques. All these evaluation parameters are combined together to find out which technique is more suitable to use when prioritizing software requirements. The results of the experiment indicate that CV is less time consuming than AHP. It was also found that CV is more scalable than AHP. Furthermore, CV is regarded as more accurate than AHP when measured subjectively in post-test.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 80 pp. Englisch.