ISBN: 9783631397664 - arguing and communicative asymmetry: the analysis of the interactive process of arguing in non-ideal situations: 263 (europaeische hochschulschriften ... / série 13: langue et littérature françaises) (6 resultados)

ISBN: 
Refinar con la Búsqueda avanzada

Filtrar la búsqueda

  • Libros (6)

a

Intervalo de precios personalizado (EUR)

a

  • Idioma: Inglés

    Editorial: Peter Lang, 2002

    3631397666 / 9783631397664

    • Tapa blanda

    Librería: Librairie La Canopee. Inc., Saint-Armand, QC, CanadaLibrairie La Canopee. Inc.

    Vendedor de 5 estrellas
    Contactar con el vendedor

    Condición: Usado - Como Nuevo

    EUR 55,91

    Envío por EUR 21,51 
    Se envía de Canada a Estados Unidos de America

    Cantidad disponible: 1 disponible

    Condición: AS NEW. Etat de NEUF / AS NEW condition 3631397666 9783631397664 BP103 1.

  • Idioma: Inglés

    Editorial: Peter Lang, 2002

    3631397666 / 9783631397664

    • Tapa blanda

    Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, AlemaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH

    Vendedor de 5 estrellas
    Contactar con el vendedor

    Condición: Nuevo

    EUR 104,20

    Envío por EUR 35,00 
    Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

    Cantidad disponible: 1 disponible

    Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Why is it that people are often inclined to accept irrational arguments or to reject rational ones It is, the author argues, because discussions in everyday life are both dialectical - conducted with the best possible solution in mind - and rhetorical - organized by the interactors in the form of a discursive event. By combining argumentation theoretical and discourse analytical insights and revisiting ancient and medieval rhetoric and dialectics, this study transcends the assumption of a symmetrical communicative situation in which only 'good' arguments matter. It redefines dialectical concepts, e.g., acceptability or conclusiveness, from a rhetorical and dialogic perspective and is thereby able to address colloquial speech arguing as the inherently asymmetrical discursive event it is.; Dissertationsschrift.…

  • Idioma: Inglés

    Editorial: Peter Lang, 2002

    3631397666 / 9783631397664

    • Tapa blanda

    Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemaniapreigu

    Vendedor de 5 estrellas
    Contactar con el vendedor

    Condición: Nuevo

    EUR 104,20

    Envío por EUR 70,00 
    Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

    Cantidad disponible: 5 disponibles

    Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Arguing and Communicative Asymmetry | The Analysis of the Interactive Process of Arguing in Non-ideal Situations | Marco Rühl | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2002 | Peter Lang | EAN 9783631397664 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Lang, Peter GmbH, Gontardstr. 11, 10178 Berlin, r[dot]boehm-korff[at]peterlang[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.…

  • Idioma: Inglés

    Editorial: Peter Lang Ltd. International Academic Publishers Sep 2002, 2002

    3631397666 / 9783631397664

    • Tapa blanda
    • Impresión bajo demanda

    Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

    Vendedor de 5 estrellas
    Contactar con el vendedor

    Condición: Nuevo

    EUR 104,20

    Envío por EUR 23,00 
    Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

    Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles

    Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Why is it that people are often inclined to accept irrational arguments or to reject rational ones It is, the author argues, because discussions in everyday life are both dialectical - conducted with the best possible solution in mind - and rhetorical - organized by the interactors in the form of a discursive event. By combining argumentation theoretical and discourse analytical insights and revisiting ancient and medieval rhetoric and dialectics, this study transcends the assumption of a symmetrical communicative situation in which only 'good' arguments matter. It redefines dialectical concepts, e.g., acceptability or conclusiveness, from a rhetorical and dialogic perspective and is thereby able to address colloquial speech arguing as the inherently asymmetrical discursive event it is. 336 pp. Englisch.…

  • Idioma: Inglés

    Editorial: Peter Lang, 2002

    3631397666 / 9783631397664

    • Tapa blanda
    • Impresión bajo demanda

    Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemaniamoluna

    Vendedor de 5 estrellas
    Contactar con el vendedor

    Condición: Nuevo

    EUR 104,20

    Envío por EUR 48,99 
    Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

    Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles

    Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Why is it that people are often inclined to accept irrational arguments or to reject rational ones? It is, the author argues, because discussions in everyday life are both dialectical - conducted with the best possible solution in mind - and rhetorical - or. …

  • Idioma: Inglés

    Editorial: Peter Lang, Peter Lang Sep 2002, 2002

    3631397666 / 9783631397664

    • Tapa blanda
    • Impresión bajo demanda

    Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemaniabuchversandmimpf2000

    Vendedor de 5 estrellas
    Contactar con el vendedor

    Condición: Nuevo

    EUR 104,20

    Envío por EUR 60,00 
    Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

    Cantidad disponible: 1 disponible

    Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Why is it that people are often inclined to accept irrational arguments or to reject rational ones It is, the author argues, because discussions in everyday life are both dialectical - conducted with the best possible solution in mind - and rhetorical - organized by the interactors in the form of a discursive event. By combining argumentation theoretical and discourse analytical insights and revisiting ancient and medieval rhetoric and dialectics, this study transcends the assumption of a symmetrical communicative situation in which only «good» arguments matter. It redefines dialectical concepts, e.g., acceptability or conclusiveness, from a rhetorical and dialogic perspective and is thereby able to address colloquial speech arguing as the inherently asymmetrical discursive event it is.Lang, Peter GmbH, Gontardstraße 11, 10178 Berlin 338 pp. Englisch.…