9781032957067 - Psychiatrists' Analysis of Politicians' Mental Health: The Ethics of Public Commentary de Rasmussen, Keith (19 resultados)

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New.

Hardback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condición: New. 2025. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . .

Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 160 pages. 8.50x5.43x8.74 inches. In Stock.

Condición: New. 2025. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politicians mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner.Rendering public opinions about politicians mental health, particularly when the professional has not conducted a first-hand assessment of the individual, can be problematic and unethical. This book reviews the legitimate methods of psychiatric and psychological evaluations, abuses of psychiatry, and ethical perspectives on publicly voicing opinions regarding public figures, and proposes an alternative assumption model for mental health professionals to render a public opinion. It is a great resource for practicing psychologists and psychiatrists to reflect on their own processes when examining the mental health of politicians.Students and trainees in the mental health sector will come away from this book with a better understanding of the ethical concerns inherent in commenting publicly on public officials mental health, and they'll find valuable guidance on how to do so in an ethical way. This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politicians mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politician's mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner.Rendering public opinions about politician's mental health, particularly when the professional has not conducted a first-hand assessment of the individual, can be problematic and unethical. This book reviews the legitimate methods of psychiatric and psychological evaluations, abuses of psychiatry, and ethical perspectives on publicly voicing opinions regarding public figures, and proposes an alternative assumption model for mental health professionals to render a public opinion. It is a great resource for practicing psychologists and psychiatrists to reflect on their own processes when examining the mental health of politicians.Students and trainees in the mental health sector will come away from this book with a better understanding of the ethical concerns inherent in commenting publicly on public officials' mental health, and they'll find valuable guidance on how to do so in an ethical way. 128 pp. Englisch.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Keith G. Rasmussen is a consultant at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. He is also a professor of psychiatry at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine.This book discusses the validity, ethi.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politicians mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner.Rendering public opinions about politicians mental health, particularly when the professional has not conducted a first-hand assessment of the individual, can be problematic and unethical. This book reviews the legitimate methods of psychiatric and psychological evaluations, abuses of psychiatry, and ethical perspectives on publicly voicing opinions regarding public figures, and proposes an alternative assumption model for mental health professionals to render a public opinion. It is a great resource for practicing psychologists and psychiatrists to reflect on their own processes when examining the mental health of politicians.Students and trainees in the mental health sector will come away from this book with a better understanding of the ethical concerns inherent in commenting publicly on public officials mental health, and they'll find valuable guidance on how to do so in an ethical way. This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politicians mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Buch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politician's mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner.Rendering public opinions about politician's mental health, particularly when the professional has not conducted a first-hand assessment of the individual, can be problematic and unethical. This book reviews the legitimate methods of psychiatric and psychological evaluations, abuses of psychiatry, and ethical perspectives on publicly voicing opinions regarding public figures, and proposes an alternative assumption model for mental health professionals to render a public opinion. It is a great resource for practicing psychologists and psychiatrists to reflect on their own processes when examining the mental health of politicians.Students and trainees in the mental health sector will come away from this book with a better understanding of the ethical concerns inherent in commenting publicly on public officials' mental health, and they'll find valuable guidance on how to do so in an ethical way.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politicians mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner.Rendering public opinions about politicians mental health, particularly when the professional has not conducted a first-hand assessment of the individual, can be problematic and unethical. This book reviews the legitimate methods of psychiatric and psychological evaluations, abuses of psychiatry, and ethical perspectives on publicly voicing opinions regarding public figures, and proposes an alternative assumption model for mental health professionals to render a public opinion. It is a great resource for practicing psychologists and psychiatrists to reflect on their own processes when examining the mental health of politicians.Students and trainees in the mental health sector will come away from this book with a better understanding of the ethical concerns inherent in commenting publicly on public officials mental health, and they'll find valuable guidance on how to do so in an ethical way. This book discusses the validity, ethics, and usefulness of professional public commentary of politicians mental health and provides an alternative model for professionals to do so in an ethical manner. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.