Seminar paper from the year 2016 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Osnabrück (Amerikanistik), course: Construction Grammar, language: English, abstract: All in all, Generative Grammar assumes that a speaker's grammatical knowledge is organized into components: the phonological component, the morphological component, the syntactic component and the semantic component. Construction Grammar, on the other hand, assumes that idiomatic expressions are everywhere and that all grammatical patterns are riddled with exceptions and idiosyncrasies. This leads to the assumption that the totality of our knowledge of language is captured by a network of constructions, a so-called "construct-i-con". Furthermore, constructions are symbolic units that are not strictly predictable. As Goldberg puts it, "[a]ny linguistic pattern is recognized as a construction as long as some aspect of its form or function is not strictly predictable from its component parts or from other constructions recognized to exist". Therefore, if the meaning of an idiom cannot be figured out by the literal meaning of its parts, it is a construction. This assumption does not automatically exclude that even a semantically compositional and regular linguistic form could be a construction, as Goldberg explains: "In addition, patterns are stored as constructions even if they are fully predictable as long as they occur with sufficient frequency". This assumption leads to the fact that predictable linguistic forms such as "I love you" or "How has your day been?" turn out to be entrenched predictable constructions.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Seminar paper from the year 2016 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Osnabrück (Amerikanistik), course: Construction Grammar, language: English, abstract: All in all, Generative Grammar assumes that a speaker's grammatical knowledge is organized into components: the phonological component, the morphological component, the syntactic component and the semantic component. Construction Grammar, on the other hand, assumes that idiomatic expressions are everywhere and that all grammatical patterns are riddled with exceptions and idiosyncrasies. This leads to the assumption that the totality of our knowledge of language is captured by a network of constructions, a so-called "construct-i-con". Furthermore, constructions are symbolic units that are not strictly predictable. As Goldberg puts it, "[a]ny linguistic pattern is recognized as a construction as long as some aspect of its form or function is not strictly predictable from its component parts or from other constructions recognized to exist". Therefore, if the meaning of an idiom cannot be figured out by the literal meaning of its parts, it is a construction. This assumption does not automatically exclude that even a semantically compositional and regular linguistic form could be a construction, as Goldberg explains: "In addition, patterns are stored as constructions even if they are fully predictable as long as they occur with sufficient frequency". This assumption leads to the fact that predictable linguistic forms such as "I love you" or "How has your day been?" turn out to be entrenched predictable constructions.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 11,00 gastos de envío desde Alemania a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2016 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Osnabrück (Amerikanistik), course: Construction Grammar, language: English, abstract: All in all, Generative Grammar assumes that a speaker's grammatical knowledge is organized into components: the phonological component, the morphological component, the syntactic component and the semantic component. Construction Grammar, on the other hand, assumes that idiomatic expressions are everywhere and that all grammatical patterns are riddled with exceptions and idiosyncrasies. This leads to the assumption that the totality of our knowledge of language is captured by a network of constructions, a so-called 'construct-i-con'. Furthermore, constructions are symbolic units that are not strictly predictable. As Goldberg puts it, '[a]ny linguistic pattern is recognized as a construction as long as some aspect of its form or function is not strictly predictable from its component parts or from other constructions recognized to exist'. Therefore, if the meaning of an idiom cannot be figured out by the literal meaning of its parts, it is a construction. This assumption does not automatically exclude that even a semantically compositional and regular linguistic form could be a construction, as Goldberg explains: 'In addition, patterns are stored as constructions even if they are fully predictable as long as they occur with sufficient frequency'. This assumption leads to the fact that predictable linguistic forms such as 'I love you' or 'How has your day been ' turn out to be entrenched predictable constructions. 20 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783668753037
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2016 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Osnabrück (Amerikanistik), course: Construction Grammar, language: English, abstract: All in all, Generative Grammar assumes that a speaker's grammatical knowledge is organized into components: the phonological component, the morphological component, the syntactic component and the semantic component. Construction Grammar, on the other hand, assumes that idiomatic expressions are everywhere and that all grammatical patterns are riddled with exceptions and idiosyncrasies. This leads to the assumption that the totality of our knowledge of language is captured by a network of constructions, a so-called 'construct-i-con'. Furthermore, constructions are symbolic units that are not strictly predictable. As Goldberg puts it, '[a]ny linguistic pattern is recognized as a construction as long as some aspect of its form or function is not strictly predictable from its component parts or from other constructions recognized to exist'. Therefore, if the meaning of an idiom cannot be figured out by the literal meaning of its parts, it is a construction. This assumption does not automatically exclude that even a semantically compositional and regular linguistic form could be a construction, as Goldberg explains: 'In addition, patterns are stored as constructions even if they are fully predictable as long as they occur with sufficient frequency'. This assumption leads to the fact that predictable linguistic forms such as 'I love you' or 'How has your day been ' turn out to be entrenched predictable constructions. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783668753037
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2016 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Osnabrück (Amerikanistik), course: Construction Grammar, language: English, abstract: All in all, Generative Grammar assumes that a speaker¿s grammatical knowledge is organized into components: the phonological component, the morphological component, the syntactic component and the semantic component. Construction Grammar, on the other hand, assumes that idiomatic expressions are everywhere and that all grammatical patterns are riddled with exceptions and idiosyncrasies. This leads to the assumption that the totality of our knowledge of language is captured by a network of constructions, a so-called ¿construct-i-con¿.Furthermore, constructions are symbolic units that are not strictly predictable. As Goldberg puts it, ¿[a]ny linguistic pattern is recognized as a construction as long as some aspect of its form or function is not strictly predictable from its component parts or from other constructions recognized to exist¿. Therefore, if the meaning of an idiom cannot be figured out by the literal meaning of its parts, it is a construction.This assumption does not automatically exclude that even a semantically compositional and regular linguistic form could be a construction, as Goldberg explains: ¿In addition, patterns are stored as constructions even if they are fully predictable as long as they occur with sufficient frequency¿. This assumption leads to the fact that predictable linguistic forms such as ¿I love yoü or ¿How has your day been ¿ turn out to be entrenched predictable constructions.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 20 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783668753037
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9783668753037
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. The Idiomatic Expression "There you are". A Constructional Analysis | Claudia Rumms | Taschenbuch | 20 S. | Englisch | 2018 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783668753037 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 114114490
Cantidad disponible: 5 disponibles