Artículos relacionados a Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate'

Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate' - Tapa blanda

 
9783640756087: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate'

Sinopsis

Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist Approach According to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980's was "in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate", between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called 'greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the 'Third Debate' does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show. This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry.

"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.

Reseña del editor

Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist Approach According to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980's was "in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate", between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called 'greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the 'Third Debate' does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show. This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry.

"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.

Comprar nuevo

Ver este artículo

GRATIS gastos de envío en Estados Unidos de America

Destinos, gastos y plazos de envío

Resultados de la búsqueda para Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate'

Imagen de archivo

Myers, Ralph
Publicado por Grin Verlag, 2010
ISBN 10: 3640756088 ISBN 13: 9783640756087
Nuevo Tapa blanda

Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America

Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas Valoración 5 estrellas, Más información sobre las valoraciones de los vendedores

Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9783640756087

Contactar al vendedor

Comprar nuevo

EUR 34,46
Convertir moneda
Gastos de envío: GRATIS
A Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envío

Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles

Añadir al carrito

Imagen del vendedor

Ralph Myers
Publicado por GRIN Verlag, GRIN Verlag Nov 2010, 2010
ISBN 10: 3640756088 ISBN 13: 9783640756087
Nuevo Taschenbuch
Impresión bajo demanda

Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania

Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas Valoración 5 estrellas, Más información sobre las valoraciones de los vendedores

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist ApproachAccording to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980's was 'in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate', between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called 'greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the 'Third Debate' does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show.This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry. 24 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783640756087

Contactar al vendedor

Comprar nuevo

EUR 16,95
Convertir moneda
Gastos de envío: EUR 23,00
De Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envío

Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles

Añadir al carrito

Imagen del vendedor

Ralph Myers
Publicado por GRIN Verlag, GRIN Verlag Nov 2010, 2010
ISBN 10: 3640756088 ISBN 13: 9783640756087
Nuevo Taschenbuch

Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania

Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas Valoración 5 estrellas, Más información sobre las valoraciones de los vendedores

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware -Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist ApproachAccording to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980¿s was ¿in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate¿, between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called ¿greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the ¿Third Debate¿ does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show.This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 24 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783640756087

Contactar al vendedor

Comprar nuevo

EUR 16,95
Convertir moneda
Gastos de envío: EUR 60,00
De Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envío

Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles

Añadir al carrito

Imagen del vendedor

Ralph Myers
Publicado por GRIN Verlag, 2010
ISBN 10: 3640756088 ISBN 13: 9783640756087
Nuevo Taschenbuch

Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania

Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas Valoración 5 estrellas, Más información sobre las valoraciones de los vendedores

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist ApproachAccording to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980's was 'in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate', between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called 'greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the 'Third Debate' does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show.This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783640756087

Contactar al vendedor

Comprar nuevo

EUR 16,95
Convertir moneda
Gastos de envío: EUR 60,26
De Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envío

Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles

Añadir al carrito