How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. Originally published in 1991, and reissued here with a new preface, the authors of Deduction repudiate this theory. They argue that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. Formal rules work syntactically; mental models work semantically. The theories therefore make different predictions about the difficulty of deductions. The book reports experiments that compared these predictions in the main domains of deduction: propositional reasoning; relational reasoning; and quantificational reasoning. In each domain, the results corroborated the model theory and ran counter to the rule theories.
The authors relate their findings to problems in artificial intelligence, linguistics and anthropology. They describe computer programs based on the model theory, including one that solves a major problem in the design of electronic circuits. Finally, they show how the theory resolves a long-standing controversy about rationality.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Phil Johnson-Laird is emeritus Stuart professor of psychology at Princeton University after earlier academic positions in England. Ruth Byrne and his collaboration began in 1986 at the MRC’s psychological unit in Cambridge and it led to Deduction. Phil continues to do research in collaborations with Ruth and other friends into reasoning, creativity, emotions, and psychological illnesses. He has published over a dozen books and several hundred papers. This research has been recognized in elections to learned societies in Britain (FRS, FBA) and America (NAS, APS), in honorary degrees, and in the award of the Fyssen prize for studies in rationality.
Ruth Byrne is the Professor of Cognitive Science at Trinity College Dublin. Her research on reasoning and imaginative thought has been published in over 150 papers and her former books include The Rational Imagination (2005). She is a member of the Royal Irish Academy and a Fellow of the Cognitive Science Society. She has been awarded the Royal Irish Academy’s Gold Medal, and the European Society for Cognitive Psychology’s Broadbent Prize.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Estados Unidos de America
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. Originally published in 1991, and reissued here with a new preface, the authors of Deduction repudiate this theory. They argue that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. Formal rules work syntactically; mental models work semantically. The theories therefore make different predictions about the difficulty of deductions. The book reports experiments that compared these predictions in the main domains of deduction: propositional reasoning; relational reasoning; and quantificational reasoning. In each domain, the results corroborated the model theory and ran counter to the rule theories.The authors relate their findings to problems in artificial intelligence, linguistics and anthropology. They describe computer programs based on the model theory, including one that solves a major problem in the design of electronic circuits. Finally, they show how the theory resolves a long-standing controversy about rationality. How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. First published in 1991, the authors of this book repudiate this theory. Arguing that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australia
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. Originally published in 1991, and reissued here with a new preface, the authors of Deduction repudiate this theory. They argue that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. Formal rules work syntactically; mental models work semantically. The theories therefore make different predictions about the difficulty of deductions. The book reports experiments that compared these predictions in the main domains of deduction: propositional reasoning; relational reasoning; and quantificational reasoning. In each domain, the results corroborated the model theory and ran counter to the rule theories.The authors relate their findings to problems in artificial intelligence, linguistics and anthropology. They describe computer programs based on the model theory, including one that solves a major problem in the design of electronic circuits. Finally, they show how the theory resolves a long-standing controversy about rationality. How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. First published in 1991, the authors of this book repudiate this theory. Arguing that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: CitiRetail, Stevenage, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. Originally published in 1991, and reissued here with a new preface, the authors of Deduction repudiate this theory. They argue that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. Formal rules work syntactically; mental models work semantically. The theories therefore make different predictions about the difficulty of deductions. The book reports experiments that compared these predictions in the main domains of deduction: propositional reasoning; relational reasoning; and quantificational reasoning. In each domain, the results corroborated the model theory and ran counter to the rule theories.The authors relate their findings to problems in artificial intelligence, linguistics and anthropology. They describe computer programs based on the model theory, including one that solves a major problem in the design of electronic circuits. Finally, they show how the theory resolves a long-standing controversy about rationality. How do people make deductions? The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. First published in 1991, the authors of this book repudiate this theory. Arguing that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Condición: New. 2026. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . . Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. 2026. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Buch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - How do people make deductions The orthodox answer is that they follow formal rules of inference. Originally published in 1991, and reissued here with a new preface, the authors of Deduction repudiate this theory. They argue that people reason by building a model of the state of affairs, formulating a conclusion based on this model, and searching for alternative models that refute it. Formal rules work syntactically; mental models work semantically. The theories therefore make different predictions about the difficulty of deductions. The book reports experiments that compared these predictions in the main domains of deduction: propositional reasoning; relational reasoning; and quantificational reasoning. In each domain, the results corroborated the model theory and ran counter to the rule theories.The authors relate their findings to problems in artificial intelligence, linguistics and anthropology. They describe computer programs based on the model theory, including one that solves a major problem in the design of electronic circuits. Finally, they show how the theory resolves a long-standing controversy about rationality. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781041374411
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles