This book defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Professor Alexander is a Warren Distinguished Professor of Law at University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of: Is There a Right to Freedom of Expression? (Cambridge, 2005); (with Emily Sherwin) The Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001); Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge, 1998); (with Paul Horton) Whom Does the Constitution Command? (1988); several anthologies; and over 160 articles, book chapters, and review essays in jurisprudence, constitutional law, criminal law, and normative ethics. He has been a member of the faculty at the University of San Diego School of Law since 1970. He is co-editor of the journal Legal Theory (Cambridge), and he serves on the editorial boards of Ethics, Law and Philosophy and Criminal Law and Philosophy. He is co-executive director of the Institute for Law and Philosophy at the University of San Diego, and he is past president of AMINTAPHIL.
Professor Sherwin is Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School. She specializes in jurisprudence, property, and remedies. She is the author (with Larry Alexander) of The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001) and has published numerous book chapters, articles, and reviews in her subjects of specialty. She was a member of the faculty at the University of Kentucky College of Law from 1985 to 1990 and the University of San Diego School of Law from 1990 to 2003, when she moved to Cornell University. She is a member of the advisory committee for the ALI's Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment and a regular participant in roundtable conferences of the University of San Diego's Institute for Law and Philosophy.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 63,80 gastos de envío desde Estados Unidos de America a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoEUR 0,89 gastos de envío desde Estados Unidos de America a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Estados Unidos de America
HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: FM-9780521878982
Cantidad disponible: 3 disponibles
Librería: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Reino Unido
HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: FM-9780521878982
Cantidad disponible: 3 disponibles
Librería: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Reino Unido
Hardback. Condición: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. 500. Nº de ref. del artículo: B9780521878982
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 1st edition. 253 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock. Nº de ref. del artículo: __0521878985
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Blue Whale Books, ABAA, Charlottesville, VA, Estados Unidos de America
Hardcover. Condición: Fine. First edition. Blue cloth with silver text on front and spine. No markings. Always securely packed. Professional booksellers since 1994. Satisfaction guaranteed. Nº de ref. del artículo: 022731
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: CitiRetail, Stevenage, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780521878982
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australia
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780521878982
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: Like New. Like New. book. Nº de ref. del artículo: ERICA78705218789856
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, Estados Unidos de America
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780521878982
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles