Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Professor Alexander is a Warren Distinguished Professor of Law at University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of: Is There a Right to Freedom of Expression? (Cambridge, 2005); (with Emily Sherwin) The Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001); Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge, 1998); (with Paul Horton) Whom Does the Constitution Command? (1988); several anthologies; and over 160 articles, book chapters, and review essays in jurisprudence, constitutional law, criminal law, and normative ethics. He has been a member of the faculty at the University of San Diego School of Law since 1970. He is co-editor of the journal Legal Theory (Cambridge), and he serves on the editorial boards of Ethics, Law and Philosophy and Criminal Law and Philosophy. He is co-executive director of the Institute for Law and Philosophy at the University of San Diego, and he is past president of AMINTAPHIL.
Professor Sherwin is Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School. She specializes in jurisprudence, property, and remedies. She is the author (with Larry Alexander) of The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001) and has published numerous book chapters, articles, and reviews in her subjects of specialty. She was a member of the faculty at the University of Kentucky College of Law from 1985 to 1990 and the University of San Diego School of Law from 1990 to 2003, when she moved to Cornell University. She is a member of the advisory committee for the ALI's Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment and a regular participant in roundtable conferences of the University of San Diego's Institute for Law and Philosophy.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 5,13 gastos de envío en Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoEUR 3,41 gastos de envío en Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: Michener & Rutledge Booksellers, Inc., Baldwin City, KS, Estados Unidos de America
Hardcover. Condición: Very Good. Light wear to covers, otherwise text clean and tight; no dust jacket; Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law; 9.26 X 6.36 X 1.19 inches; 428 pages. Nº de ref. del artículo: 216922
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. pp. 264. Nº de ref. del artículo: 26616297
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: ABLIING23Feb2416190012579
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Best Price, Torrance, CA, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780521703956
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Phatpocket Limited, Waltham Abbey, HERTS, Reino Unido
Condición: Good. Your purchase helps support Sri Lankan Children's Charity 'The Rainbow Centre'. Ex-library, so some stamps and wear, but in good overall condition. Our donations to The Rainbow Centre have helped provide an education and a safe haven to hundreds of children who live in appalling conditions. Nº de ref. del artículo: Z1-H-013-01624
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Condición: New. pp. 264. Nº de ref. del artículo: 8313014
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9780521703956
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, Estados Unidos de America
Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780521703956
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Alemania
Condición: New. pp. 264. Nº de ref. del artículo: 18616291
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: New. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Nº de ref. del artículo: LU-9780521703956
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles