supreme court idea progress (34 resultados)

Condición: good. A copy that has been read, remains in good condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact. The spine and cover show signs of wear. Pages can include notes and highlighting and show signs of wear, and the copy can include "From the library of" labels or previous owner inscriptions. 100% GUARANTEE! Shipped with delivery confirmation, if you're not satisfied with purchase please return item! Ships via media mail.

Trade Paperback. Condición: Very Good. Alston Purvis (Cover Design) Ilustrador. 1st HarperTorchbook Ed., 1970. 210 pp. Nearly flawless book save publisher's remainder and browning on inside covers. Includes relevant articles placed by previous owner.

paperback. Condición: Acceptable. Acceptable - This is a significantly damaged book. It should be considered a reading copy only. Please order this book only if you are interested in the content and not the condition. May be ex-library. PAPERBACK Standard-sized.

Hardcover. Condición: Good. Estado de la sobrecubierta: No Dust Jacket. 1st Edition (Unstated); Second Printing. 210 pages; Ex-Library copy with usual identifiers. Pen markings on a few pages. Fading to cover edges, light.; - We offer free returns for any reason and respond promptly to all inquiries. Your order will be packaged with care and ship on the same or next business day. Buy with confidence.

Condición: Good. First edition copy. . Good dust jacket. Owner's name on front endpage, crossed out. (Supreme Court).

Condición: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. Clean from markings. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,300grams, ISBN:

Paperback. Condición: New. Timeless questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the American political and legal system are raised in the late Alexander Bickel's characteristically astute analysis of the work of the Warren Court. He takes issue with the Court's view that its role should be to move the American polity in the direction of perfect equality and expresses his preference for "a more faithful adherence to the method of analytical reason, and a less confident reliance on the intuitive capacity to identify the course of progress." First published in 1970, this book made news with its prediction that the Court's best-known decision, in Brown v. Board of Education, might be headed for "irrelevance." Bickel charged the Court, particularly in its segregation and reapportionment cases, with being irrational, inconsistent, and even incoherent and argued that its decisions would lead to unwise centralization of government. He explored the limitations on the role of the court in stimulating social progress and concluded that the Warren Court had intervened in matters of social policy where the political process, not judicial action, should apply. "Process is what especially concerned him - the relationship between the legal and the political process in a country where the two are uniquely intermixed. If he criticized something done by the courts for the stated purpose of speeding school desegregation, that did not mean that he favored state-imposed racial discrimination; in fact he abhorred it. He was concerned, rather, about trying to solve complicated problems by legal formulas instead of leaving them to the give-and-take of the political process." -- Anthony Lewis.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Ex-library, otherwise good (no markings to clean text) in lightly worn dust jacket. 210pp. ISBN 0300022387.

Paperback or Softback. Condición: New. The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. Book.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Timeless questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the American political and legal system are raised in the late Alexander Bickels characteristically astute analysis of the work of the Warren Court. He takes issue with the Courts view that its role should be to move the American polity in the direction of perfect equality and expresses his preference for "a more faithful adherence to the method of analytical reason, and a less confident reliance on the intuitive capacity to identify the course of progress." First published in 1970, this book made news with its prediction that the Courts best-known decision, in Brown v. Board of Education, might be headed for "irrelevance." Bickel charged the Court, particularly in its segregation and reapportionment cases, with being irrational, inconsistent, and even incoherent and argued that its decisions would lead to unwise centralization of government. He explored the limitations on the role of the court in stimulating social progress and concluded that the Warren Court had intervened in matters of social policy where the political process, not judicial action, should apply. "Process is what especially concerned him the relationship between the legal and the political process in a country where the two are uniquely intermixed. If he criticized something done by the courts for the stated purpose of speeding school desegregation, that did not mean that he favored state-imposed racial discrimination; in fact he abhorred it. He was concerned, rather, about trying to solve complicated problems by legal formulas instead of leaving them to the give-and-take of the political process." -- Anthony Lewis A history of the Warren Court and its impact on the political and legal system. Best known for its treatment of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, which Bickel believed was headed for obsolescence and abandonment. Based on the Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures at Harvard Law School in 1969. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Condición: Good. Good condition. Acceptable dust jacket. (United States Supreme Court, Constitutional law) A copy that has been read but remains intact. May contain markings such as bookplates, stamps, limited notes and highlighting, or a few light stains.

Paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: New. In.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. 2009. Revised ed. paperback. . . . . .

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: New. 2009. Revised ed. paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condición: Near Fine. Estado de la sobrecubierta: Very Good+ DJ. 2nd Edition. Yale University Press 1978 2nd Edition Near Fine/Very Good+ DJ Red cloth with gilded spine lettering. Upper page edges dyed black are bright. Light foxing to pages and page edges o/w Fine. Solid Structure. Tight lightly tanned pages. Minimal mending to brigh tdust jacket. 210 pages. 14.0 ounces. Size: 8 1/4 x 5 3/8 x 7/8 inches.

Hardcover. Condición: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Hardcover. Condición: New. Stated First Edition.

Paperback. Condición: New. Timeless questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the American political and legal system are raised in the late Alexander Bickel's characteristically astute analysis of the work of the Warren Court. He takes issue with the Court's view that its role should be to move the American polity in the direction of perfect equality and expresses his preference for "a more faithful adherence to the method of analytical reason, and a less confident reliance on the intuitive capacity to identify the course of progress." First published in 1970, this book made news with its prediction that the Court's best-known decision, in Brown v. Board of Education, might be headed for "irrelevance." Bickel charged the Court, particularly in its segregation and reapportionment cases, with being irrational, inconsistent, and even incoherent and argued that its decisions would lead to unwise centralization of government. He explored the limitations on the role of the court in stimulating social progress and concluded that the Warren Court had intervened in matters of social policy where the political process, not judicial action, should apply. "Process is what especially concerned him - the relationship between the legal and the political process in a country where the two are uniquely intermixed. If he criticized something done by the courts for the stated purpose of speeding school desegregation, that did not mean that he favored state-imposed racial discrimination; in fact he abhorred it. He was concerned, rather, about trying to solve complicated problems by legal formulas instead of leaving them to the give-and-take of the political process." -- Anthony Lewis.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - A history of the Warren Court and its impact on the political and legal system. Best known for its treatment of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, which Bickel believed was headed for obsolescence and abandonment. Based on the Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures at Harvard Law School in 1969.

Hardcover. Condición: Good. xii, 210p.

XII, 210 S. OLwd. Sprache: Englisch.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

HC. Condición: VG. Estado de la sobrecubierta: VG.

PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.