Librería: Booksavers of Virginia, Harrisonburg, VA, Estados Unidos de America
EUR 12,76
Convertir monedaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Añadir al carritohardcover. Condición: Very Good. Signed. In very good, unmarked condition. Dedication written on the dedication page. Potential author's signature (first name only). No DJ. Your purchase benefits the world-wide relief efforts of Mennonite Central Committee.
Librería: Windows Booksellers, Eugene, OR, Estados Unidos de America
Miembro de asociación: CBA
EUR 76,31
Convertir monedaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Añadir al carritoCasebound Hardcover. Like new 372 pp.
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
EUR 92,17
Convertir monedaCantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Añadir al carritoCondición: New. In.
Librería: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Reino Unido
EUR 169,89
Convertir monedaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Añadir al carritoHardcover. Condición: Like New. Like New. book.
Librería: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Reino Unido
EUR 106,13
Convertir monedaCantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Añadir al carritoHardback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 730.
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
EUR 143,70
Convertir monedaCantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Añadir al carritoBuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In Common Grounds without Foundations, David Kratz Mathies offers an alternative, fallibilist model of moral reasoning rooted in the American Pragmatic tradition. Additional resources drawn from Chinese philosophy, Jain epistemology, modern philosophy of mathematics, and the Gadamerian hermeneutical tradition serve both to corroborate the argumentation and to provide examples of continuities in reasoning that cross the boundaries of disparate traditions. Ironically, the very success of arguments for the tradition-dependent nature of rationality belies their conclusions-even religious claims make their appeal with some level of public reason-and a nonfoundationalist theory of knowledge more accurately reflects both our scientific progress and our projects of everyday enquiry. Ultimately, an analysis of our best epistemic practices provides us with prima facie biases in favor of both diversity and free speech (without the need to appeal to any tradition-dependent axioms like inherent worth, human dignity, or the possession of a soul)-to be concretized in institutions like human rights and democracy.