9783844333121 - Comparing Brand Personality Measures: An Empirical Study of Geuens et al.'s and Aaker's Scales de Alpatova, Anastasia (6 resultados)

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Comparing Brand Personality Measures | An Empirical Study of Geuens et al.'s and Aaker's Scales | Anastasia Alpatova | Taschenbuch | 100 S. | Englisch | 2011 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9783844333121 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

paperback. Condición: New. NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -In response to wide criticism of brand personality measures for embracing other aspects rather than brand personality construct alone, Geuens et al. (2009) have recently introduced a new measure that consists of personality items only. The present research seeks to empirically examine and compare Geuens et al. s scale with the established alternative measure by Aaker (1997). The data was collected with the use of a split sample approach and by means of questionnaire survey, within the UK premium skincare market. The comparisons were carried out in brand- and respondent-level analyses. The results show that both measures revealed similar patterns in terms of personality profiles of the studied brands, however Geuens et al. s measure discriminated more between brands and between consumer segments. It is concluded that the findings provide solid justification in favour of the new measure s superiority over the commonly used alternative by Aaker in the given research context. This study should be useful to marketing scholars and practitioners alike, or anyone else who may be considering utilizing brand personality measures for marketing efforts. 100 pp. Englisch.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Alpatova AnastasiaMA Marketing: In 2010 graduated with Distinction from Kingston Business School, London. Currently working as Marketing Coordinator at EVE LOM (Space NK), London.In response to wide criticism of brand personalit.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -In response to wide criticism of brand personality measures for embracing other aspects rather than brand personality construct alone, Geuens et al. (2009) have recently introduced a new measure that consists of personality items only. The present research seeks to empirically examine and compare Geuens et al.'s scale with the established alternative measure by Aaker (1997). The data was collected with the use of a split sample approach and by means of questionnaire survey, within the UK premium skincare market. The comparisons were carried out in brand- and respondent-level analyses. The results show that both measures revealed similar patterns in terms of personality profiles of the studied brands, however Geuens et al.'s measure discriminated more between brands and between consumer segments. It is concluded that the findings provide solid justification in favour of the new measure's superiority over the commonly used alternative by Aaker in the given research context. This study should be useful to marketing scholars and practitioners alike, or anyone else who may be considering utilizing brand personality measures for marketing efforts.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 100 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In response to wide criticism of brand personality measures for embracing other aspects rather than brand personality construct alone, Geuens et al. (2009) have recently introduced a new measure that consists of personality items only. The present research seeks to empirically examine and compare Geuens et al. s scale with the established alternative measure by Aaker (1997). The data was collected with the use of a split sample approach and by means of questionnaire survey, within the UK premium skincare market. The comparisons were carried out in brand- and respondent-level analyses. The results show that both measures revealed similar patterns in terms of personality profiles of the studied brands, however Geuens et al. s measure discriminated more between brands and between consumer segments. It is concluded that the findings provide solid justification in favour of the new measure s superiority over the commonly used alternative by Aaker in the given research context. This study should be useful to marketing scholars and practitioners alike, or anyone else who may be considering utilizing brand personality measures for marketing efforts.