Idioma: Inglés
Publicado por Institute for Public Policy Research, 2010
ISBN 10: 1860303358 ISBN 13: 9781860303357
Librería: Crappy Old Books, Barry, Reino Unido
EUR 11,36
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Añadir al carritoPaperback. Condición: Good. There are few words in modern politics capable of emptying a room quite as efficiently as "constitutional reform." Mention dragons, serial killers or alien invasions and people lean forward eagerly. Mention devolution and they suddenly remember an urgent appointment elsewhere. Yet Devolution in Practice 2010 performs the remarkable feat of taking one of Britain?s most complex political experiments and making it genuinely interesting. Published by the Institute for Public Policy Research and written by Guy Lodge and Katie Schmuecker, this volume arrives from a period when politicians were enthusiastically redistributing powers around the United Kingdom with the confidence of people assembling flat-pack furniture without first reading the instructions. The theory seemed straightforward enough: move decisions closer to the people affected by them. The practice, as this book explores, proved rather more complicated. Within these pages lies an examination of how devolution was actually working in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and beyond. Rather than merely admiring constitutional diagrams from a safe distance, the authors venture into the messy reality of governance, where noble ambitions collide with budgets, bureaucracy, elections and the occasional inconvenient fact. The result is a fascinating snapshot of Britain attempting one of its largest political reorganisations in generations. Readers may discover that devolution is rather like renovating an old house. The plans look elegant on paper, everyone agrees that improvements are needed, and then somebody discovers a pipe running through the middle of a wall that nobody realised existed. One of the pleasures of this book is that it captures a particular moment in history. Published in 2010, it sits at an intriguing crossroads. Some readers will approach it as contemporary policy analysis. Others will find themselves reading it as a historical document from a Britain that was still several constitutional earthquakes away from referendums, endless debates about national identity and the political landscape we recognise today. There is also a certain irony in the subject matter. Devolution was intended, at least in part, to make government feel more local, more responsive and more connected to everyday lives. Yet explaining exactly who is responsible for what often seems to require a flowchart, three legal textbooks and a large pot of coffee. This book patiently guides readers through the complexity without assuming they already possess an honorary degree in constitutional law. The authors balance practical policy analysis with broader questions about democracy, accountability and representation. How should power be shared? Does moving authority geographically improve decision-making? Can local priorities coexist with national ambitions? These are questions that remain stubbornly relevant, which is perhaps why books on public policy have a habit of becoming unexpectedly topical years after publication. This Good-condition copy remains an excellent addition for students of politics, public policy enthusiasts, historians of modern Britain or anyone who has ever watched a political debate and wondered which layer of government was actually supposed to be responsible for the matter under discussion. It is considerably less stressful than reading parliamentary committee reports and substantially shorter than attending an actual constitutional convention. Whether you are fascinated by the machinery of government or simply curious about why Britain?s political map sometimes resembles a compromise reached after a very long meeting, this book offers a thoughtful and surprisingly readable guide. Sold by Crappy Old Books, where even a decade-old policy report can become a historical artefact, a political time capsule and a reminder that whenever politicians promise to simplify something, the resulting explanation is usually several hundred pages long.