9780521027588 - Collective Actn Articles Confedertn de Dougherty (18 resultados)

Condición: very_good. This books is in Very good condition. There may be a few flaws like shelf wear and some light wear.

Condición: New.

Condición: New. In.

Paperback. Condición: New.

Condición: New. This 2001 book focuses on the reasons that states contributed to the government under the Articles of Confederation. Num Pages: 224 pages, 8 b/w illus. 7 tables. BIC Classification: 1KBB; 3JF; JP. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 13. Weight in Grams: 340. . 2008. 1st Edition. paperback. . . . .

Condición: New. pp. 224.

Condición: New. This 2001 book focuses on the reasons that states contributed to the government under the Articles of Confederation. Num Pages: 224 pages, 8 b/w illus. 7 tables. BIC Classification: 1KBB; 3JF; JP. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 13. Weight in Grams: 340. . 2008. 1st Edition. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Paperback. Condición: Like New. Like New. book.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Rather than focus on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation asks why they, in fact, did--even when they should not have been expected to contribute. Why did states pay large portions of their requisitions to the federal government when problems of collective action and the lack of governmental incentives suggest that they should not have Using original data, Keith L. Dougherty shows that states contributed to the national government when doing so produced local gains.

paperback. Condición: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not have been expected to contribute. Why did states pay large portions of their requisitions to the federal government when problems of collective action and the lack of governmental incentives suggest that they should not have? Using original data on Continental troop movements and federal debt holdings within each state, in this 2001 book, Dougherty shows that states contributed to the national government when doing so produced local gains. Such a theory stands in stark contrast to the standard argument that patriotism and civic duty encouraged state cooperation. Material incentives and local interests bound the union together and explained the push for constitutional reform more than the common pursuit of mutual goals. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation, first published in 2011, asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not have been expected to contribute. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 1st edition. 211 pages. 9.00x6.25x0.50 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. 224 2:B&W 6 x 9 in or 229 x 152 mm Perfect Bound on Creme w/Gloss Lam.

Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 224.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not have been expected to contribute. Why did states pay large portions of their requisitions to the federal government when problems of collective action and the lack of governmental incentives suggest that they should not have? Using original data on Continental troop movements and federal debt holdings within each state, in this 2001 book, Dougherty shows that states contributed to the national government when doing so produced local gains. Such a theory stands in stark contrast to the standard argument that patriotism and civic duty encouraged state cooperation. Material incentives and local interests bound the union together and explained the push for constitutional reform more than the common pursuit of mutual goals. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation, first published in 2011, asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not have been expected to contribute. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation, first published in 2011, asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not.

Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not have been expected to contribute. Why did states pay large portions of their requisitions to the federal government when problems of collective action and the lack of governmental incentives suggest that they should not have? Using original data on Continental troop movements and federal debt holdings within each state, in this 2001 book, Dougherty shows that states contributed to the national government when doing so produced local gains. Such a theory stands in stark contrast to the standard argument that patriotism and civic duty encouraged state cooperation. Material incentives and local interests bound the union together and explained the push for constitutional reform more than the common pursuit of mutual goals. Rather than focusing on why the states did not contribute to the national government under the Articles of Confederation, Collective Action under the Articles of Confederation, first published in 2011, asks why they, in fact, did - even when they should not have been expected to contribute. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.