Six Weeks to Defeat The Fall of France, 1940

In May 1940, the French Army was widely seen as the strongest land force in Europe. By mid-June, France had fallen, its government in flight, its soldiers marching into captivity. Between those dates lies one of the most misunderstood campaigns of the Second World War.

Told through the eyes of Lieutenant Pierre Dubois, a fortress engineer at the massive Maginot Line position of Fort Hackenberg, this book follows the Battle of France from the illusion of security to the shock of defeat - and into the prison camps where officers have nothing left but time to ask what went wrong.

Inside the fort's concrete galleries, Dubois and his men begin the campaign convinced that technology, planning and firepower have made France impregnable. As German forces break through at Sedan, race to the Channel and encircle entire armies, that confidence shatters. Orders arrive late or not at all. Communications fail. Refugee columns clog the roads. Air attack becomes a constant, terrifying presence.

In a transit compound attached to Stalag IV-D in Saxony, Dubois joins officers from armoured divisions, staff headquarters and the Dunkirk perimeter. Around a rough table of Red Cross crates, they start to piece together the larger story of France's defeat.

The book weaves front-line narrative with clear, structured analysis, showing how tactical shocks and deep structural flaws combined to bring down a great power at unprecedented speed:

• Doctrine built for 1918, not 1940: a defensive "Maginot mentality" facing an enemy who treated fortifications as obstacles to go around, not walls to assault.
• Blitzkrieg as a system: tanks, aircraft, artillery and radio used together to create tempo, shock and constant uncertainty.
• Leadership and command failure: cautious headquarters, rigid chains of command and senior officers chosen for bureaucracy rather than battlefield imagination.
• Politics and industry: revolving-door governments, budget cuts and stop-start rearmament versus a regime that aligned strategy, economy and propaganda to a single goal.
• Intelligence that counted weapons but missed ideas: German doctrine and operational thinking evolving faster than French analysts could accept.
• Air power and morale: dive-bombers used as flying artillery, a scattered French air force, and the psychological impact of realising that the sky itself now belonged to the enemy.
• Alliance failure: French, British and Belgian forces fighting side by side but not truly together, with incompatible doctrines, equipment and priorities.

By the time Dubois closes his makeshift journal in the dim light of the camp gymnasium, the military verdict is clear: France did not fall because its soldiers lacked courage, but because its institutions, doctrine and leadership proved unable to match a new form of war.

The Battle of France lasted six weeks. Its consequences - occupation, collaboration, resistance and a transformed balance of power in Europe - shaped the rest of the Second World War and the world that followed. This book shows how and why it happened.

I was born in Varna, Bulgaria, on the edge of the Black Sea - a place where history is never really "past". Growing up between old empires and new borders, I was surrounded by stories of wars, occupations, disappearances and sudden changes of flag.

Later I moved to Warsaw, Poland, where I studied history and public relations at the Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN). Warsaw is a city built on ruins and memories, and it forced me to ask one question over and over again:

Why is so much of our most important history told in the most boring way possible?

From dry facts to living stories

Like every history student, I spent endless hours buried in heavy academic books - dates, treaties, footnotes stacked on footnotes. I respected the work, but I often felt like the life had been drained out of the events themselves.

That changed when I discovered Ryszard Kapuściński. His books had that rare tone I'd been searching for: history and politics told through people, scenes and atmosphere. It was factual, but it breathed.

From that moment I knew what I wanted to do: take serious history and tell it with the clarity and tension of a documentary - so future generations don't have to suffer through dead, lifeless books to understand the past.

What I write about

My books focus on the places where power is most visible - and most hidden:

• Wars and battles
• Espionage and cyber conflict
• Country histories

Some books are big, sweeping national histories. Others zoom in on a single battle, uprising or covert operation. All of them try to answer the same question: What really happened here, and what does it mean for the people who had to live through it?

How I tell history

If you read my books, you can expect narrative, scene-by-scene storytelling - not just lists of dates. Serious research from archives, memoirs, official reports and investigative journalism. Clear explanations of complex events like cyberattacks and proxy wars. And a refusal to simplify messy, uncomfortable truths.

I don't write official history. I don't write propaganda. I write stories that are honest, human and readable - the kind of books I was always looking for as a student and rarely found.

If you care about how we got from trenches and partitions to cyberwar and drone strikes - and you don't want to fall asleep over another textbook - I wrote these books for you.