The Role of Legal Argumentation and Human Dignity in Constitutional Courts (Paperback). Este artículo no está disponible.
Idioma: inglés
Editorial: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2019
- Tapa blanda
- Nuevo

Librería: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Estados Unidos de AmericaGrand Eagle Retail
Vendedor de 5 estrellas
Vendedor de AbeBooks desde 12 de octubre de 2005
No disponible
Tapa blanda
Condición: Nuevo
EUR 29,70
Descripción del artículo del vendedor
Paperback. The legal argumentation of constitutional courts, for instance on human dignity has been in the centre of interest both from a theoretical and practical perspective. This book addresses the role of legal argumentation at first in general, covering empirical and comparative perspectives on constitutional argumentative practices. It also comprises a comparative assessment of constitutional argumentation versus argumentation deployed by other courts as well as by decision-makers. Secondly, the book focuses on how constitutional courts reason with human dignity. This concept takes many different shapes, though very rarely in an objective fashion. It is embedded in several western constitutions, although constitutional courts and scholars tend to disagree on its meaning and content. Finally, the book aims to shed light on the controversial topic of human dignity from a normative and philosophical perspective. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.
N° de ref. del artículo 9783848757220
- Título
- The Role of Legal Argumentation and Human Dignity in Constitutional Courts (Paperback)
- Autor
- Miguel Nogueira de Brito
- Editorial
- Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Estado
- new
- Encuadernación
- Paperback
- Idioma
- inglés
- ISBN 10
- 3848757222
- ISBN 13
- 9783848757220
The legal argumentation of constitutional courts, for instance on human dignity has been in the centre of interest both from a theoretical and practical perspective. This book addresses the role of legal argumentation at first in general, covering empirical and comparative perspectives on constitutional argumentative practices. It also comprises a comparative assessment of constitutional argumentation versus argumentation deployed by other courts as well as by decision-makers. Secondly, the book focuses on how constitutional courts reason with human dignity. This concept takes many different shapes, though very rarely in an objective fashion. It is embedded in several western constitutions, although constitutional courts and scholars tend to disagree on its meaning and content. Finally, the book aims to shed light on the controversial topic of human dignity from a normative and philosophical perspective.
“Sinopsis” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.