Legitimate Justification for Expropriation: A Comparative Law and Governance Analysis. Este artículo no está disponible.
Idioma: inglés
Editorial: Juta & Company Ltd, 2017
- Tapa blanda
- Nuevo

Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino UnidoRia Christie Collections
Vendedor de IberLibro desde 25 de marzo de 2015
Condición: Nuevo
EUR 72,71
Descripción del artículo del vendedor
In English.
N° de ref. del artículo ria9781485120902_new
- Título
- Legitimate Justification for Expropriation: A Comparative Law and Governance Analysis
- Autor
- Hoops, Bjorn
- Editorial
- Juta & Company Ltd
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Estado
- New
- Encuadernación
- Encuadernación de tapa blanda
- Idioma
- inglés
- ISBN 10
- 148512090X
- ISBN 13
- 9781485120902
- Peso del artículo
- 1279 gramos
Property is a constitutionally protected right around the world. Expropriations are lawful only if they can be legitimately justified. In the past few decades, there has been an increasing number of expropriations in favour of private business projects. Governments hope that these projects will create jobs and economic growth, but the justification of such third-party transfers for economic development is controversial. The public benefits of such expropriations are disputed, since they directly benefit private parties, and frequently do not have the desired outcome.
The Legitimate Justification of Expropriation: A Comparative Law and Governance Analysis investigates the institutional, procedural, and substantive conditions under which different jurisdictions permit third-party transfers for economic development. The jurisdictions examined are the Netherlands, Germany, New York State and South Africa.
The Legitimate Justification of Expropriation: A Comparative Law and Governance Analysis shows that employment or economic growth created by private business projects is a legitimate end in all the jurisdictions under examination. However, some striking differences between the jurisdictions are evident, with respect to several questions, including: Which state body decides on whether economic development is a legitimate end? Can a judge prevent unnecessary or excessive expropriations? Is the project developer obliged to implement the project?
Against the backdrop of international good governance standards, The Legitimate Justification of Expropriation: A Comparative Law and Governance Analysis assesses whether the laws in these jurisdictions are adequate. The book demonstrates that the examined jurisdictions in various respects fail to meet international standards and recommends legal reforms to ensure compliance.
“Sinopsis” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.