The Issue with Tamerlane (History: Fiction or Science?). Este artículo no está disponible.The Issue with Tamerlane (History: Fiction or Science?)

'The Issue with Tamerlane' reports to the sceptic reader that oversized Tamerlane character reflects actually TWO distinct persons. Moreover, not a drop of Ghengis blood in neither of them. Tamerlane was a collation of traits of Slavic warlord Timur the Lame and Turkic warlord Mehmet II. This book contains enough solid evidence to silence any historian by the sheer power of facts and argumentation.'The Issue with Tamerlane' is the most explosive tractate on history ever written – however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data. The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources.'The Issue with Tamerlane' confirms American philosopher Santana definition: « History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren't there ». On one hand, Dr. Fomenko et al call everybody, historians including, to apply the Occam's razor to the world history. On the other, the scientists Dr. Fomenko et al are ready to recognize their alleged mistakes of New Chronology theory, to repent and to retract if and only if:- radiocarbon dating methods or dendrochronology pass a rigorous anonymous 'black box' tests;- verifiable astronomic data refute their results on solar eclipses;- it is proven irrefutably that Robert Newton (NASA astrophysicist) was wrong calling 'ancient' Ptolemy the greatest conman in history in his 'Crime of Claudius Ptolemy' book; At present historians heed too well the prescient advice of Saint Augustin "..beware of mathematicians, especially when they speak the truth! " - and are not willing to apply the exact sciences toolbox. Beware of the Occam's razor as their beautiful web of lies is too fragile! The radiocarbon dating labs run their very costly tests only if the sample to be dated is accompanied with an idea of age pronounced by historians on basis of...subjective..mmm...gut-feeling and the history books they have been writing for the last 400 years. Radiocarbon labs happily bill for their fiddling and finetuning with C14 hardware to get the dates 'to order' of historians. Consensual chronology is safe! Circulus Vicious is perfect. Connect the dots...! https://evilempireblog.wordpress.com/