Iranian Influence on Moslem Literature, Part I. Este artículo no está disponible.Iranian Influence on Moslem Literature, Part I

This book examines the intricate connections between Iranian culture and Arabic literature following the Arab conquest of Persia, focusing particularly on how Sasanian traditions were preserved and transformed within Islamic writing. The opening of the book establishes a framework for understanding the Persian historical narrative in conjunction with the rise of Arabic literature, highlighting that much of Iran's cultural history survived through various literary forms and translations despite the upheaval caused by the Arab expansion. It outlines key areas of influence, such as literature produced by Arabic writers that draws upon Iranian sources, as well as the role of the Parsi clergy in conserving and transmitting ancient Persian traditions amidst the sociopolitical changes of the Islamic period. In this context, Inostrantzev sets the stage for a deeper exploration into specific literary contributions and their ongoing relevance in both Persian and Arabic traditions.

I ranian literary tradition in the opening centuries of Islam 1 The character of the Persian history during the Sasanian epoch 6 Importance of this epoch according to the Arab writers of the first centuries of Islam 10 The position of the Parsi community and the centres of the preservation of Persian tradition during the period of the Khalifat in Tabaristan, Khorasan and Fars 15 The castle of Shiz in the district of Arrajan in the province of Fars described by Istakhri, p. 118, 2-4; 150, 14-7; Ibn Hauqal, p. 189, 1-2; cf. the translator of the Khoday Nameh, Behram, son of Mardanshah of the city of Shapur in the province of Fars 19 This castle was the residence of those acquainted with the Iranian tradition (the badhgozar) and here their archives were lodged 20 ARABIC WRITERS AS SOURCES OF SASANIAN CULTURE

Whenever the circumstances have been favourable it has been clearly manifest; when the conditions have been hostile it is not noticeable at the first glance but in reality has been of great consequence. The causes of this are very complicated. And it is necessary on account of its universal value to examine a wide concatenation of facts. But from a general point of view there is no doubt that it has its roots principally in the continuity of the historical and cultural traditions. Particular significance attaches to the circumstance that just in the epoch preceding the Arab conquest Persia had experienced a period of national revival after the horrors that its sovereignty had undergone, at the hands, for instance, of Alexander the Great.