Geodetic Boundary Value Problem: the Equivalence b. Este artículo no está disponible.
Idioma: inglés
Editorial: Springer, 2016
- Tapa blanda
- Nuevo

Librería: Basi6 International, Irving, TX, Estados Unidos de AmericaBasi6 International
Vendedor de AbeBooks desde 24 de junio de 2016
Condición: Nuevo
EUR 60,21
Descripción del artículo del vendedor
New. Delivery takes 25-30 days. Excellent Customer Service.
N° de ref. del artículo POD-190736
- Título
- Geodetic Boundary Value Problem: the Equivalence b
- Autor
- Sansò, Fernando; Sideris, Michael G.
- Editorial
- Springer
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Estado
- Brand New
- Encuadernación
- Encuadernación de tapa blanda
- Idioma
- inglés
- ISBN 10
- 3319463578
- ISBN 13
- 9783319463575
- Serie
- Libro 47 de 65: SpringerBriefs in Earth Sciences
This book offers a new approach to interpreting the geodetic boundary value problem, successfully obtaining the solutions of the Molodensky and Stokes boundary value problems (BVPs) with the help of downward continuation (DC) based methods. Although DC is known to be an improperly posed operation, classical methods seem to provide numerically sensible results, and therefore it can be concluded that such classical methods must in fact be manifestations of different, mathematically sound approaches.
Here, the authors first prove the equivalence of Molodensky’s and Stoke's approaches with Helmert’s reduction in terms of both BVP formulation and BVP solutions by means of the DC method. They then go on to show that this is not merely a downward continuation operation, and provide more rigorous interpretations of the DC approach as a change of boundary approach and as a pseudo BVP solution approach.
“Sinopsis” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.
Reseña del editor
This book offers a new approach to interpreting the geodetic boundary value problem, successfully obtaining the solutions of the Molodensky and Stokes boundary value problems (BVPs) with the help of downward continuation (DC) based methods. Although DC is known to be an improperly posed operation, classical methods seem to provide numerically sensible results, and therefore it can be concluded that such classical methods must in fact be manifestations of different, mathematically sound approaches.
Here, the authors first prove the equivalence of Molodensky’s and Stoke's approaches with Helmert’s reduction in terms of both BVP formulation and BVP solutions by means of the DC method. They then go on to show that this is not merely a downward continuation operation, and provide more rigorous interpretations of the DC approach as a change of boundary approach and as a pseudo BVP solution approach.
“Acerca de” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.