Forensic Science Evidence : Can the Law Keep Up With Science?. Este artículo no está disponible.
Idioma: inglés
Editorial: Lfb Scholarly Pub Llc, 2012
- Tapa dura
- Usado

Librería: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Reino UnidoGreatBookPricesUK
Vendedor de 5 estrellas
Vendedor de AbeBooks desde el 28 de enero de 2020
No disponible
Tapa dura
Condición: Usado - Aceptable
EUR 82,26
Descripción del artículo del vendedor
May show signs of wear, highlighting, writing, and previous use. This item may be a former library book with typical markings. No guarantee on products that contain supplements Your satisfaction is 100% guaranteed. Twenty-five year bookseller with shipments to over fifty million happy customers.
N° de ref. del artículo 18959473-5
- Título
- Forensic Science Evidence : Can the Law Keep Up With Science?
- Autor
- Shelton, Donald E.
- Editorial
- Lfb Scholarly Pub Llc
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Estado
- good
- Encuadernación
- Encuadernación de tapa dura
- Idioma
- inglés
- ISBN 10
- 1593325177
- ISBN 13
- 9781593325176
Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of truswortiness of much of the "scientific" evidence that was used to convict people who turned out to be innocent. The Congressionally commissioned report of the National Academy of Sciences documented the lack of scientific basis in many of these areas. Nevertheless, Shelton discloses that many courts continue to routinely admit such evidence in criminal cases, in spite of the obligation of judges to be the "gatekeepers" of forensic science evidence. He explores reasons for that phenomenon and describes whether and how it might change in the future.
“Sinopsis” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.
Reseña del editor
Shelton describes the startling questions that have arisen about the reliability of many forms of scientific evidence which were traditionally regarded as reliable and have been routinely admitted to prove guilt. The exonerations resulting from the development of DNA have exposed the lack of truswortiness of much of the "scientific" evidence that was used to convict people who turned out to be innocent. The Congressionally commissioned report of the National Academy of Sciences documented the lack of scientific basis in many of these areas. Nevertheless, Shelton discloses that many courts continue to routinely admit such evidence in criminal cases, in spite of the obligation of judges to be the "gatekeepers" of forensic science evidence. He explores reasons for that phenomenon and describes whether and how it might change in the future.
“Acerca de” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.
Resultados de la búsqueda para Forensic Science Evidence : Can the Law Keep Up With Science?
Hay 10 copias más de este libroVer todos los resultados