How Consistent are Interpretations of the Principle of Proportionality in Situations of Asymmetric Conflicts?

Idioma: inglés

Editorial: GRIN Verlag Feb 2017, 2017

366837760X / 9783668377608

  • Tapa blanda
  • Nuevo
Ver todos los detalles

Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, AlemaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

Vendedor de 5 estrellas

Vendedor de AbeBooks desde 11 de enero de 2012

Ver los artículos de este vendedor
Tapa blanda

Condición: Nuevo

EUR 42,95

Envío por EUR 23,00 
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles

Añadir al carrito
Devoluciones gratuitas de 30 días

Descripción del artículo del vendedor

This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Master's Thesis from the year 2015 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 69 (Merit) - UK System, University College London (School of Public Policy), course: Human Rights, language: English, abstract: In this paper I present a holistic approach to identify how consistent interpretations of jus in bello proportionality regarding precision strikes in the context of counterinsurgency operations are by examining both consistency in substance and process. I hypothesize that there is high inconsistency in proportionality balancing, and will illustrate that it is both a theoretical and practical problem by using a mixed-methods design of empirical and theoretical analysis. Doing so, I will move beyond a positivist reading of the law to present my argument though a normative framework. I will argue that to fully comprehend this inconsistency one needs to understand the normative relationship between IHL and IHRL.Structurally, I begin the thesis with an empirical analysis of case law and of the counterinsurgency policy of the US to demonstrate (in)consistency by rethinking it in four specific categories: scope, content, time, certainty. The purpose of this section is to evidence variance in interpretations of the proportionality variables and of the balancing act in ex-post (jurisprudence) and ex-ante (policy) assessments. Secondly, I will engage in a purposive analysis of the legal framework presenting theoretical approaches on the relationship of IHL with IHRL. This is to dismiss inconsistency in proportionality balancing as a ROL problem by showing that there is a higher (normative) purpose behind it. In the final chapter, I will apply the theoretical findings to the empirical discoveries to demonstrate that inconsistency is due to a 'proportionality continuum'. This section will illustrate that inconsistency is not inherently bad as long as it serves the protective purpose intrinsic to both IHL and IHRL, which suggests changing policy rather than the law. 72 pp. Englisch.

N° de ref. del artículo 9783668377608

Título
How Consistent are Interpretations of the Principle of Proportionality in Situations of Asymmetric Conflicts?
Autor
Anna Scheithauer
Editorial
GRIN Verlag Feb 2017
Año de publicación
2017
Estado
Neu
Encuadernación
Taschenbuch
Idioma
inglés
ISBN 10
366837760X
ISBN 13
9783668377608
Peso del artículo
118 gramos
Dimensiones
210x148x6 mm

BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania

Vendedor de 5 estrellas

Vendedor de AbeBooks desde 11 de enero de 2012

Tarifas de envío de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America

ArtículoDe 5 a 15 días hábilesDe 5 a 15 días hábiles
Primer artículoEUR 23,00EUR 23,00
Los plazos de entrega los establecen los vendedores y varían según el transportista y la ubicación. Los pedidos que pasan por la aduana pueden sufrir retrasos y los compradores son responsables de los aranceles o tarifas asociadas. Los vendedores pueden ponerse en contacto con usted en relación con cargos adicionales para cubrir cualquier aumento en los costes de envío de los artículos.

Métodos de pago

  • Visa
  • Mastercard
  • American Express
  • Carte Bleue
  • Apple Pay
  • Google Pay
  • Cheque
  • Giro bancario
  • PayPal

Información empresarial del vendedor

BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

Alemania